Contesting Chineseness: An Examination of Religion and National Identity in Mainland China

For citizens of many countries around the world, religion is a necessary-though often contested-component of their national identity. From the vantage point of the symbolic boundaries approach, we argue that the Chinese government and various other social actors are in contestation to define "C...

全面介紹

Saved in:  
書目詳細資料
主要作者: Lu, Jun (Author)
其他作者: Gao, Qin 1977- (Author)
格式: 電子 Article
語言:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
載入...
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
出版: [2018]
In: Journal for the scientific study of religion
Year: 2018, 卷: 57, 發布: 2, Pages: 318-340
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B China / 宗教 / 民族意識 / 政治認同
IxTheo Classification:AG Religious life; material religion
KBM Asia
Further subjects:B symbolic boundaries
B China
B 宗教
B Chineseness
B National Identity
在線閱讀: Volltext (Resolving-System)
Volltext (doi)
實物特徵
總結:For citizens of many countries around the world, religion is a necessary-though often contested-component of their national identity. From the vantage point of the symbolic boundaries approach, we argue that the Chinese government and various other social actors are in contestation to define "Chineseness" in religious terms. Using data from the 2007 Spiritual Life Study of Chinese Residents, this study explores the extent to which religion functions as a constitutive part of Chinese national identity. We find that the effectiveness of the Chinese government's demarcation of the symbolic boundaries around Chineseness related to religion varies across religious groups. Believers of each religion are likely to be strong advocates for their own religion's connection to Chinese national identity. Among the religions, traditional Chinese religions tend to demonstrate a stronger affinity with one another than with Christianity. Daoists are a particularly strong contestant in aligning Daoism with Chineseness, to the extent that they discredit the other religions' suitability for the Chinese. We discuss the implications of these findings and point out directions for future research.
ISSN:1468-5906
Contains:Enthalten in: Journal for the scientific study of religion
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1111/jssr.12519