Natural Law, Catholicism, and the Protestant Critique: Why We Are Really Not That Far Apart
Catholics and Evangelical Protestants often find themselves on the same side on a variety of issues in bioethics. However, some Evangelicals have expressed reluctance to embrace the natural law reasoning used by Catholics in academic and policy debates. In this article, I argue that the primary conc...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Oxford University Press
[2019]
|
In: |
Christian bioethics
Year: 2019, Volume: 25, Issue: 2, Pages: 154-168 |
IxTheo Classification: | CF Christianity and Science KDB Roman Catholic Church KDD Protestant Church KDG Free church NCH Medical ethics |
Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (Resolving-System) Volltext (doi) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 166926100X | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20240409142810.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 190716s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1093/cb/cbz001 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)166926100X | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP166926100X | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)171784804 |0 (DE-627)06202857X |0 (DE-576)16610423X |4 aut |a Beckwith, Francis |d 1960- | |
109 | |a Beckwith, Francis 1960- |a Beckwith, Francis J. 1960- |a Beckwith, Francis Joseph 1960- |a Beckwith, Frank 1960- | ||
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Natural Law, Catholicism, and the Protestant Critique |b Why We Are Really Not That Far Apart |c Francis J Beckwith |
264 | 1 | |c [2019] | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Catholics and Evangelical Protestants often find themselves on the same side on a variety of issues in bioethics. However, some Evangelicals have expressed reluctance to embrace the natural law reasoning used by Catholics in academic and policy debates. In this article, I argue that the primary concerns raised by Evangelicals about natural law reasoning are, ironically, concerns expressed by and intrinsic to the natural law tradition itself. To show this, I address two types of Protestant critics: (1) the Frustrated Fellow Traveler and (2) the Solo Scripturist. | ||
601 | |a Protestant | ||
652 | |a CF:KDB:KDD:KDG:NCH | ||
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Christian bioethics |d Oxford : Oxford University Press, 1995 |g 25(2019), 2, Seite 154-168 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320433358 |w (DE-600)2004029-5 |w (DE-576)094085587 |x 1744-4195 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:25 |g year:2019 |g number:2 |g pages:154-168 |
856 | |u https://academic.oup.com/cb/article-pdf/25/2/154/28886062/cbz001.pdf |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h publisher [open (via free pdf)] | ||
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://academic.oup.com/cb/article/25/2/154/5525410 |x Resolving-System |3 Volltext |
856 | |u https://doi.org/10.1093/cb/cbz001 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 349369864X | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 166926100X | ||
LOK | |0 005 20220215105122 | ||
LOK | |0 008 190716||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442049839 |a KDB | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442050047 |a KDD | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1550736558 |a NCH | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 144204389X |a CF | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442050470 |a KDG | ||
OAS | |a 1 | ||
ORI | |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw |