Moon over academe
The authors consider critically the Annual International Conference of the Unity of the Sciences (ICUS) sponsored by S.M. Moon. Thirty eminent scientists who had endorsed ICUS responded to a personal letter. By analyzing their replies systematically, we identified their rationales in the face of ant...
Publicado en: | Journal of religion and health |
---|---|
Autores principales: | ; |
Tipo de documento: | Electrónico Artículo |
Lenguaje: | Inglés |
Verificar disponibilidad: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Publicado: |
Springer Science + Business Media B. V.
[1981]
|
En: |
Journal of religion and health
Año: 1981, Volumen: 20, Número: 1, Páginas: 35-40 |
Otras palabras clave: | B
Eminent Scientist
B Case History B Open Expression B Religious Freedom B Personal Letter |
Acceso en línea: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) |
Sumario: | The authors consider critically the Annual International Conference of the Unity of the Sciences (ICUS) sponsored by S.M. Moon. Thirty eminent scientists who had endorsed ICUS responded to a personal letter. By analyzing their replies systematically, we identified their rationales in the face of anti-cult publicity. Our experiences represent a case history in the calculated misapplication of the principles of open expression, religious freedom, and the search for values. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1573-6571 |
Obras secundarias: | Enthalten in: Journal of religion and health
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1007/BF01533285 |