Some conceptions of the new age
To verify and supplement a series of quantitative studies of attitudes about the New Age in which 143 panelists were surveyed, I analyzed qualitatively 86 comments. In general, findings were consistent with those yielded by statistical analyses. An expert panel was more tolerant of terms, practices,...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
[1993]
|
In: |
Journal of religion and health
Year: 1993, Volume: 32, Issue: 4, Pages: 261-276 |
Further subjects: | B
Expert Panel
B Religious Preference B Frequent Topic B Quantitative Study B Traditional Preference |
Online Access: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) |
Summary: | To verify and supplement a series of quantitative studies of attitudes about the New Age in which 143 panelists were surveyed, I analyzed qualitatively 86 comments. In general, findings were consistent with those yielded by statistical analyses. An expert panel was more tolerant of terms, practices, and beliefs than a panel of critics. Many respondents characterized the New Age as complex, diverse, and eclectic. When I examined those comments that were concerned with the survey itself, I classified them as predominantly unfavorable, with most charging ambiguity of items and bias on the part of the investigators. When I inspected the comments for frequent topics, those with off-beat religious preferences were more favorable to the New Age than those with traditional preferences. Positive suggestions, expressions of tolerance, and other remarks were noted. I concluded that skeptics and anti-cult specialists may have to change their conceptions of the New Age. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1573-6571 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Journal of religion and health
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1007/BF00990953 |