The history of Classical Hebrew: From the invention of the alphabet to the Mishnah
A lively debate has engulfed the study of the early history of the Hebrew language in the past two decades. Traditionally, scholars classified the language of the Hebrew Bible into three categories: Archaic, Standard, and Late Biblical Hebrew. But recent trends in biblical criticism have tended to d...
| Published in: | Religion compass |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Wiley-Blackwell
[2019]
|
| In: |
Religion compass
Year: 2019, Volume: 13, Issue: 4, Pages: 1-12 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Hebrew language
/ Language
/ Writing
/ History
|
| IxTheo Classification: | AA Study of religion BH Judaism |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) Volltext (doi) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1667859706 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20201028162210.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 190624s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/rec3.12299 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1667859706 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1667859706 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)139299254 |0 (DE-627)609823078 |0 (DE-576)311110754 |4 aut |a Schniedewind, William M. |d 1962- | |
| 109 | |a Schniedewind, William M. 1962- |a Schniedewind, Bill 1962- | ||
| 245 | 1 | 4 | |a The history of Classical Hebrew |b From the invention of the alphabet to the Mishnah |c William M. Schniedewind |
| 264 | 1 | |c [2019] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a A lively debate has engulfed the study of the early history of the Hebrew language in the past two decades. Traditionally, scholars classified the language of the Hebrew Bible into three categories: Archaic, Standard, and Late Biblical Hebrew. But recent trends in biblical criticism have tended to date biblical literature much later, and some scholars date almost all of biblical literature to the Persian and Hellenistic periods. This trend undoes traditional linguistic categories for biblical Hebrew and questions the validity of the linguistic dating of biblical literature. In spite of the challenges, a modified and more complex model for the history of Classical Hebrew remains the working consensus model. A lively debate has engulfed the study of the early history of the Hebrew language in the past two decades, especially advanced by the work of Ian Young and Robert Rezetko (e.g., Young & Rezetko, ). Conferences have been organized to address this issue (e.g., Miller-Naudé & Zevit, ). Young and Rezetko have continued to advocate for their approach in spite of critical reviews (e.g., Joosten, ). Traditionally, scholars have classified the language of the Hebrew Bible into three categories: Archaic Biblical Hebrew (that is, early biblical poems), Standard Biblical Hebrew (the major part of biblical literature), and Late Biblical Hebrew (comprising compositions from the Persian and Hellenistic periods). But trends in biblical criticism over the past several decades have tended to date biblical literature later and later. Now, one can find some prominent scholars who date almost all of biblical literature-and particularly Pentateuchal literature (Sommer, )-to the Persian and Hellenistic periods. This trend raises serious questions about the validity of the traditional linguistic dating of biblical literature. Although some have ignored this linguistic problem, others have offered a variety of rationales justifying the dismissal of linguistic dating. These divergent trends have resulted in continuing debate regarding the historical linguistics of Biblical Hebrew that is addressed in Ronald Hendel and Jan Joosten's recent book, How Old is the Hebrew Bible? (2018). | ||
| 601 | |a Historie | ||
| 601 | |a Alphabet | ||
| 601 | |a Mishnah | ||
| 652 | |a AA:BH | ||
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4023922-6 |0 (DE-627)106301276 |0 (DE-576)208952055 |2 gnd |a Hebräisch |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4056449-6 |0 (DE-627)106154745 |0 (DE-576)209117702 |2 gnd |a Sprache |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4053297-5 |0 (DE-627)104162376 |0 (DE-576)209103140 |2 gnd |a Schrift |
| 689 | 0 | 3 | |q z |2 gnd |a Geschichte |
| 689 | 0 | |5 (DE-627) | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Religion compass |d Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell, 2007 |g 13(2019), 4, Seite 1-12 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)547663854 |w (DE-600)2392083-X |w (DE-576)278762514 |x 1749-8171 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:13 |g year:2019 |g number:4 |g pages:1-12 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/rec3.12299 |x Resolving-System |3 Volltext |
| 856 | |u https://doi.org/10.1111/rec3.12299 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 13 |j 2019 |e 4 |h 1-12 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 3489527534 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1667859706 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20201028162210 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 190624||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442043520 |a BH | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442042966 |a AA | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| STA | 0 | 0 | |a Hebrew language,Old Hebrew language,Old Testament Hebrew language,History,History,History in art,Language,Language,Writing,Writing,Script,Writing system,System of writing |
| STB | 0 | 0 | |a Histoire,Histoire,Histoire,Hébreu,Langage,Langage,Langue,Langue,Langue (motif),Langue,Écriture,Écriture |
| STC | 0 | 0 | |a Escritura,Escritura,Hebreo,Historia,Historia,Historia,Lengua,Lengua,Idioma,Idioma,Lenguaje,Idioma (Motivo),Idioma |
| STD | 0 | 0 | |a Ebraico,Lingua <motivo>,Lingua,Linguaggio,Linguaggio,Linguaggio (motivo),Linguaggio,Scrittura,Scrittura,Storia,Storia |
| STE | 0 | 0 | |a 历史,史,希伯来语,希伯来文,文字,文字,语言 |
| STF | 0 | 0 | |a 希伯來語,希伯來文,文字,文字,歷史,史,語言 |
| STG | 0 | 0 | |a Escritura,Escritura,Hebraico,História,História,Língua,Língua,Idioma,Idioma,Idioma (Motivo),Idioma |
| STH | 0 | 0 | |a Иврит,История (мотив),История,Письменность,Письменность,Алфавит,Алфавит (мотив),Язык (речь, мотив),Язык (речь) |
| STI | 0 | 0 | |a Γλώσσα (μοτίβο),Γλώσσα,Γραφή (μοτίβο),Γραφή,Εβραϊκή γλώσσα,Ιστορία (μοτίβο),Ιστορία |
| SUB | |a REL | ||
| SYG | 0 | 0 | |a Althebräisch,Biblisches Hebräisch,Bibelhebräisch,Alttestamentliches Hebräisch,Klassisches Hebräisch,Biblisch-hebräisch , Sprachen , Schriften , History,Geschichtliche Epoche,Historical development,Historische Entwicklung,Landesgeschichte,Regionalgeschichte,Ortsgeschichte,Zeitgeschichte |