LAW BEYOND GOD AND KANT: A PRAGMATIST PATH

The liberal principle of reciprocity requires that states maintain neutrality with respect to their citizens' competing comprehensive worldviews (both religious and secular) while officially justifying the law and while adjudicating under it. But the very possibility of such liberal neutrality...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of law and religion
Main Author: Anderson, John P. 1971- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Cambridge Univ. Press [2017]
In: Journal of law and religion
Further subjects:B Multiculturalism
B Pluralism
B Pragmatism
B Reciprocity
B Liberal constitutionalism
B Democracy
B Religion
B Neutrality
B neopragmatism
B Abortion
B Modus Vivendi
B Secularism
Online Access: Presumably Free Access
Volltext (Resolving-System)
Volltext (doi)
Description
Summary:The liberal principle of reciprocity requires that states maintain neutrality with respect to their citizens' competing comprehensive worldviews (both religious and secular) while officially justifying the law and while adjudicating under it. But the very possibility of such liberal neutrality has come under attack in a post-Enlightenment world in which even foundational arguments for the principle of reciprocity itself are no longer taken for granted. This article offers a pragmatist path to the resolution of this liberal dilemma. It recommends a "default and challenge" model for legal justification and legitimation that is rooted in social-linguistic practice. By rooting justification and legitimation in practice, it is argued liberal neutrality can be preserved without need for appeals to controversial foundational commitments at any level of public political justification. The article closes with a fictional case study concerning abortion to show how politicians and courts can apply this method to preserve liberal neutrality while addressing even the most controversial issues.
ISSN:2163-3088
Contains:Enthalten in: Journal of law and religion
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1017/jlr.2017.9