INDIVIDUAL CONSCIENCE AND HOW IT SHOULD BE TREATED
This essay summarizes crucial ways that society-in particular, the United States-has treated claims by individuals to be free of generally required duties because their convictions tell them that performing the duties is deeply wrong. Among the topics I address are how the Supreme Court decisions in...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Outros Autores: | ; ; |
| Tipo de documento: | Recurso Electrónico Review |
| Idioma: | Inglês |
| Verificar disponibilidade: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Publicado em: |
[2016]
|
| Em: |
Journal of law and religion
Ano: 2016, Volume: 31, Número: 3, Páginas: 306-320 |
| Outras palavras-chave: | B
Resenha
|
| Acesso em linha: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) Volltext (doi) |
| Resumo: | This essay summarizes crucial ways that society-in particular, the United States-has treated claims by individuals to be free of generally required duties because their convictions tell them that performing the duties is deeply wrong. Among the topics I address are how the Supreme Court decisions involving constitutional rights and organizational claims relate to this treatment, but my main focus is on what I see as the critical issues and what I believe to be the wise choices for addressing such claims. Without attempting an extensive account of all that has been written on claims of exemptions, I refer to some relatively recent books that can help one to understand what is at stake and what can be said in favor of competing positions. I also provide references to recent and forthcoming work of my own that explores claims of exemptions in greater depth. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2163-3088 |
| Obras secundárias: | Enthalten in: Journal of law and religion
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1017/jlr.2016.40 |
