El Estado-Iglesia: Kierkegaard vs. Lutero y el protestantismo (Razones filosóficas)
Kierkegaard in his Diary has ¿ven a favorable philosophical judgment on the facts with which Luther has initiated the Reforma, for with these has affirmed the compeUnce authoritj of the individual who is a prius with respect to the State and the Church. On the other hand, Kierkegaard has pointed out...
| 主要作者: | |
|---|---|
| 格式: | 電子 Article |
| 語言: | Spanish |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | 載入...
|
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| 出版: |
[2019]
|
| In: |
Veritas
Year: 2019, 卷: 42, Pages: 99-125 |
| IxTheo Classification: | KAG Church history 1500-1648; Reformation; humanism; Renaissance KAH Church history 1648-1913; modern history NCD Political ethics |
| Further subjects: | B
Think
B Single B Protestantism B church-state B Luther |
| 在線閱讀: |
Volltext (doi) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| 總結: | Kierkegaard in his Diary has ¿ven a favorable philosophical judgment on the facts with which Luther has initiated the Reforma, for with these has affirmed the compeUnce authoritj of the individual who is a prius with respect to the State and the Church. On the other hand, Kierkegaard has pointed out that these acts have been vitiated by philosop bical reasons that have led not onlj to the formation of the Church of State, but to that of the Church-State. Firstlj, these are politicalphilosophical reasons: a confused conception of power, a devaluation of the individual in favor of the community and the state, a mistaken perspective of man's happiness and salvation. In addition, Kierkegaard has pointed out strictlj philosoph-ical reasons that have led the Church State: a mistaken conception of being and an erroneous visión of what is reason and knowledge. These reasons, positive and negative, point to issues not jet resolved in our times. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0718-9273 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Veritas
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.4067/S0718-92732019000100099 |