Framing Reality: Shaping the News Coverage of the 1996 Tennessee Debate on Teaching Evolution
This study triangulated research methods to analyze how the public debate on a controversial issue was framed, and by whom, as a means of understanding the process and outcome of that debate. Its findings support the idea that public debates are framed by all involved parties, not just the news medi...
| Publié dans: | Journal of media and religion |
|---|---|
| Auteur principal: | |
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group
[2003]
|
| Dans: |
Journal of media and religion
|
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) |
| Résumé: | This study triangulated research methods to analyze how the public debate on a controversial issue was framed, and by whom, as a means of understanding the process and outcome of that debate. Its findings support the idea that public debates are framed by all involved parties, not just the news media. It also considered how the relative power position held by each side in this debate may have affected their interactions with the news media. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1534-8415 |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Journal of media and religion
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1207/S15328415JMR0201_2 |