Reason, Love, and Morality: The Limits of Reason in Kohlberg and the Importance of Love in Augustine and Smith
This study contrasts the moral development theory of Lawrence Kohlberg with the Augustinian structure represented in the work of James K. A. Smith. Where Kohlberg emphasizes cognition and rational ability, Smith focuses on the formation of loves acquired by habits. The theories differ ontologically...
| Главный автор: | |
|---|---|
| Формат: | Электронный ресурс Статья |
| Язык: | Английский |
| Проверить наличие: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Опубликовано: |
[2019]
|
| В: |
Religious education
Год: 2019, Том: 114, Выпуск: 1, Страницы: 69-81 |
| Нормированные ключевые слова (последовательности): | B
Kohlberg, Lawrence 1927-1987
/ Здравый смысл
/ Augustinus, Aurelius, Святой (мотив) 354-430
/ Любовь (мотив)
/ Smith, James K. A. 1970-
|
| Индексация IxTheo: | AB Философия религии NCB Индивидуальная этика |
| Online-ссылка: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) |
| Итог: | This study contrasts the moral development theory of Lawrence Kohlberg with the Augustinian structure represented in the work of James K. A. Smith. Where Kohlberg emphasizes cognition and rational ability, Smith focuses on the formation of loves acquired by habits. The theories differ ontologically and teleologically, which results in wide pedagogical distinctions. This study suggests that focusing on the loves through formation offers a richer expression of education and a more holistic forming of students |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1547-3201 |
| Второстепенные работы: | Enthalten in: Religious education
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/00344087.2018.1492290 |
