Self-Referring Deformities: Humour in Early Modern Sermon Literature
Few studies have addressed comprehensively the place of jesting in early modern pulpit rhetoric. This article documents some of the humour-jests and witty speech-in the period's extant sermon literature. Specifically it identifies the analytical potential of revisiting an ancient, and early mod...
| Главный автор: | |
|---|---|
| Формат: | Электронный ресурс Статья |
| Язык: | Английский |
| Проверить наличие: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Опубликовано: |
[2018]
|
| В: |
Literature and theology
Год: 2018, Том: 32, Выпуск: 3, Страницы: 255-269 |
| Индексация IxTheo: | CD Христианство и культура KAH Новое время RE Гомилетика |
| Online-ссылка: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (Resolving-System) Volltext (doi) |
| Итог: | Few studies have addressed comprehensively the place of jesting in early modern pulpit rhetoric. This article documents some of the humour-jests and witty speech-in the period's extant sermon literature. Specifically it identifies the analytical potential of revisiting an ancient, and early modern, idea: that the laughable is a kind of deformitas (deformity). A standard approach in studies of humour from the early modern period has been to identify 'scorn' as its centraI emotional category. However, with reference especially to the sermons of Hugh Latimer in the 1540s and Thomas Adams in the first decades of the seventeenth century, I shall argue that scorn for what is deemed 'other', and therefore 'low', does not exhaust the range of affective rhetoric achieved by jests against 'deformities' in sermons. Pulpit jesting also generates what are called here 'self-referring' laughable deformities, with much more complex affective purposes. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1477-4623 |
| Второстепенные работы: | Enthalten in: Literature and theology
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1093/litthe/frw039 |
