Orality, Literacy and Memory in the Composition and Transmission of Christian Ezra Apocalypses

A cluster of Christian Ezra apocalypses from the 2nd to 9th century, namely the Greek Apocalypse of Esdras, the Greek Apocalypse of Sedrach and the Latin Vision of Ezra, clearly draw their inspiration from the first-century Jewish apocalypse 4 Ezra (2 Esdras 3-14) and share many common features amon...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Gore-Jones, Lydia 19XX- (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Publié: [2018]
Dans: Journal of early Christian history
Année: 2018, Volume: 8, Numéro: 2, Pages: 75-95
Classifications IxTheo:HD Judaïsme ancien
KAB Christianisme primitif
KAD Haut Moyen Âge
NBQ Eschatologie
Sujets non-standardisés:B Latin Vision of Ezra
B Pseudepigrapha
B Greek Apocalypse of Esdras
B Apocalyptic Literature
B Christian Apocrypha
B Greek Apocalypse of Sedrach
B textual relationship
B orality and literacy
Accès en ligne: Volltext (Resolving-System)
Description
Résumé:A cluster of Christian Ezra apocalypses from the 2nd to 9th century, namely the Greek Apocalypse of Esdras, the Greek Apocalypse of Sedrach and the Latin Vision of Ezra, clearly draw their inspiration from the first-century Jewish apocalypse 4 Ezra (2 Esdras 3-14) and share many common features among themselves. Yet conventional textual criticism has failed to offer a satisfactory explanation to account for their similarities and divergences both among themselves and vis-à-vis other apocalyptic works not in the pseudonym of Ezra. This article presents an alternative approach to explain textual relationship by taking into account 1) the role orality played in the process of composition, performance and transmission; 2) the interplay of orality and literacy; 3) the role of memory in the formation of traditions; and 4) eventually viewing textual relationship not as stemmatics but a network of traditions in a common religious and intellectual context.
ISSN:2471-4054
Contient:Enthalten in: Journal of early Christian history
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1080/2222582X.2018.1484670