Was Julian Right? A Re-Evaluation of Augustine's and Mani's Doctrines of Sexual Concupiscence and the Transmission of Sin: Part 2
This two-part article focuses on the question: Was Julian of Eclanum (c. 380-454) right in accusing Augustine (354-430) of still being a Manichaean, based on his view of sexual concupiscence and the transmission of (original) sin? The second part of the article focuses on the essentials of Augustine...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | Recurso Electrónico Artigo |
| Idioma: | Inglês |
| Verificar disponibilidade: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Publicado em: |
[2018]
|
| Em: |
Journal of early Christian history
Ano: 2018, Volume: 8, Número: 2, Páginas: 1-15 |
| Classificações IxTheo: | BF Gnose KAB Cristianismo primitivo NBE Antropologia NCF Ética sexual |
| Outras palavras-chave: | B
Augustine
B random motion B sexual concupiscence B Julian of Eclanum B Mani B Original Sin |
| Acesso em linha: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) |
