Was Julian Right? A Re-Evaluation of Augustine's and Mani's Doctrines of Sexual Concupiscence and the Transmission of Sin: Part 2
This two-part article focuses on the question: Was Julian of Eclanum (c. 380-454) right in accusing Augustine (354-430) of still being a Manichaean, based on his view of sexual concupiscence and the transmission of (original) sin? The second part of the article focuses on the essentials of Augustine...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Publié: |
[2018]
|
| Dans: |
Journal of early Christian history
Année: 2018, Volume: 8, Numéro: 2, Pages: 1-15 |
| Classifications IxTheo: | BF Gnosticisme KAB Christianisme primitif NBE Anthropologie NCF Éthique sexuelle |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Augustine
B random motion B sexual concupiscence B Julian of Eclanum B Mani B Original Sin |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) |
