Was Julian Right? A Re-Evaluation of Augustine's and Mani's Doctrines of Sexual Concupiscence and the Transmission of Sin: Part 2
This two-part article focuses on the question: Was Julian of Eclanum (c. 380-454) right in accusing Augustine (354-430) of still being a Manichaean, based on his view of sexual concupiscence and the transmission of (original) sin? The second part of the article focuses on the essentials of Augustine...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | Electrónico Artículo |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Verificar disponibilidad: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Publicado: |
[2018]
|
| En: |
Journal of early Christian history
Año: 2018, Volumen: 8, Número: 2, Páginas: 1-15 |
| Clasificaciones IxTheo: | BF Gnosis KAB Cristianismo primitivo NBE Antropología NCF Ética sexual |
| Otras palabras clave: | B
Augustine
B random motion B sexual concupiscence B Julian of Eclanum B Mani B Original Sin |
| Acceso en línea: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) |
