Was Julian Right? A Re-Evaluation of Augustine's and Mani's Doctrines of Sexual Concupiscence and the Transmission of Sin: Part 2
This two-part article focuses on the question: Was Julian of Eclanum (c. 380-454) right in accusing Augustine (354-430) of still being a Manichaean, based on his view of sexual concupiscence and the transmission of (original) sin? The second part of the article focuses on the essentials of Augustine...
| 1. VerfasserIn: | |
|---|---|
| Medienart: | Elektronisch Aufsatz |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Veröffentlicht: |
[2018]
|
| In: |
Journal of early Christian history
Jahr: 2018, Band: 8, Heft: 2, Seiten: 1-15 |
| IxTheo Notationen: | BF Gnosis KAB Kirchengeschichte 30-500; Frühchristentum NBE Anthropologie NCF Sexualethik |
| weitere Schlagwörter: | B
Augustine
B random motion B sexual concupiscence B Julian of Eclanum B Mani B Original Sin |
| Online-Zugang: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) |
