Autonomy-Based Reasons for Limitarianism
This paper aims to provide autonomy-based reasons in favour of limitarianism. Limitarianism affirms it is of primary moral importance that no one gets too much. The paper challenges the standard assumption that having more material resources always increases autonomy. It expounds five mechanisms thr...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Springer Science + Business Media B. V
[2018]
|
| In: |
Ethical theory and moral practice
Year: 2018, Volume: 21, Issue: 5, Pages: 1181-1204 |
| IxTheo Classification: | NCC Social ethics NCE Business ethics VA Philosophy |
| Further subjects: | B
Incentives
B Distributive Justice B Autonomy B Limitarianism B Coercion B Wealth |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1662930046 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20190619131642.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 190408s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s10677-018-9958-7 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1662930046 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1662930046 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Zwarthoed, Danielle |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Autonomy-Based Reasons for Limitarianism |c Danielle Zwarthoed |
| 264 | 1 | |c [2018] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a This paper aims to provide autonomy-based reasons in favour of limitarianism. Limitarianism affirms it is of primary moral importance that no one gets too much. The paper challenges the standard assumption that having more material resources always increases autonomy. It expounds five mechanisms through which having too much material wealth might undermine autonomy. If these hypotheses are true, a theory of justice guided by a concern for autonomy will support a limitarian distribution of wealth. Finally, the paper discusses two issues autonomy-based limitarianism would raise. First, insofar as coercion invades autonomy, do autonomy-based reasons legitimate coercive measures to secure a limitarian distribution of wealth? Second, is a limitarian ethos consistent with the incentive to produce enough wealth to secure distributive justice? | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Autonomy | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Coercion | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Distributive Justice | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Incentives | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Limitarianism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Wealth | |
| 652 | |a NCC:NCE:VA | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Ethical theory and moral practice |d Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1998 |g 21(2018), 5, Seite 1181-1204 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320527093 |w (DE-600)2015306-5 |w (DE-576)104558555 |x 1572-8447 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:21 |g year:2018 |g number:5 |g pages:1181-1204 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-018-9958-7 |x Resolving-System |3 Volltext |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 342093646X | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1662930046 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20191107120519 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 190408||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442053844 |a VA | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442052953 |a NCE | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 144205283X |a NCC | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||