Harming the Beneficiaries of Humanitarian Intervention

This paper challenges one line of argument which has been advanced to justify imposing risks of collateral harm on prospective beneficiaries of armed humanitarian interventions. This argument - the 'Beneficiary Principle' (BP) - holds that non-liable individuals' immunity to being har...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Eggert, Linda (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Springer Science + Business Media B. V [2018]
In: Ethical theory and moral practice
Year: 2018, Volume: 21, Issue: 5, Pages: 1035-1050
IxTheo Classification:NCD Political ethics
VA Philosophy
ZC Politics in general
Further subjects:B Liability
B Ex ante contractualism
B Lesser-evil justifications
B Humanitarian Intervention
B Risk imposition
B Collateral harm
B Immunity
Online Access: Presumably Free Access
Volltext (Resolving-System)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1662929986
003 DE-627
005 20190619131645.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 190408s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/s10677-018-9944-0  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1662929986 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1662929986 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1145217044  |0 (DE-627)1005524955  |0 (DE-576)49568127X  |4 aut  |a Eggert, Linda 
109 |a Eggert, Linda 
245 1 0 |a Harming the Beneficiaries of Humanitarian Intervention  |c Linda Eggert 
264 1 |c [2018] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a This paper challenges one line of argument which has been advanced to justify imposing risks of collateral harm on prospective beneficiaries of armed humanitarian interventions. This argument - the 'Beneficiary Principle' (BP) - holds that non-liable individuals' immunity to being harmed as a side effect of just armed humanitarian interventions may be diminished by their prospects of benefiting from the intervention. Against this, I defend the view that beneficiary status does not morally distinguish beneficiaries from other non-liable individuals in such a way as to permit exposing them to greater risks of being harmed. The argument proceeds in four steps. I first show that the BP can neither be grounded in liability-based nor in lesser-evil justifications for harming. I then argue that a standalone justification for unintended harming based on beneficiary status would face at least two critical challenges. The first concerns the BP's applicability to collectives; the second questions the normative weight we can plausibly ascribe to beneficiary status when beneficiaries are such by virtue of being victims of wrongful threats of harm. I argue that standing to benefit is morally irrelevant when the benefit consists in the mitigation or prevention of wrongful harms, and consequently suggest that the BP may only serve as a distributive principle in allocating risks of harm if it is disambiguated in a number of critical aspects and applied in a more narrowlydefined set of circumstances. 
601 |a Intervention 
650 4 |a Collateral harm 
650 4 |a Ex ante contractualism 
650 4 |a Humanitarian Intervention 
650 4 |a Immunity 
650 4 |a Lesser-evil justifications 
650 4 |a Liability 
650 4 |a Risk imposition 
652 |a NCD:VA:ZC 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Ethical theory and moral practice  |d Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1998  |g 21(2018), 5, Seite 1035-1050  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320527093  |w (DE-600)2015306-5  |w (DE-576)104558555  |x 1572-8447  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:21  |g year:2018  |g number:5  |g pages:1035-1050 
856 |u https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10677-018-9944-0.pdf  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h publisher [open (via page says license)] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-018-9944-0  |x Resolving-System  |3 Volltext 
936 u w |d 21  |j 2018  |e 5  |h 1035-1050 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3420936400 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1662929986 
LOK |0 005 20191107114644 
LOK |0 008 190408||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442053844  |a VA 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1550736965  |a ZC 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442052856  |a NCD 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL