Ignatius of Antioch and the Arian Controversy
Preliminary Material /Paul R. Gilliam III -- Introduction /Paul R. Gilliam III -- The Arian Controversy and the ‘Authentic’ Letters of Ignatius of Antioch /Paul R. Gilliam III -- God Language in the Ignatian Long Recension: A Christological Profile /Paul R. Gilliam III -- The Ignatian Long Recension...
Resumo: | Preliminary Material /Paul R. Gilliam III -- Introduction /Paul R. Gilliam III -- The Arian Controversy and the ‘Authentic’ Letters of Ignatius of Antioch /Paul R. Gilliam III -- God Language in the Ignatian Long Recension: A Christological Profile /Paul R. Gilliam III -- The Ignatian Long Recension in Fourth-Century Christological Context /Paul R. Gilliam III -- Eusebius of Caesarea, Athanasius of Alexandria, and Ignatius of Antioch /Paul R. Gilliam III -- John Chrysostom: In Defense of Ignatius /Paul R. Gilliam III -- Conclusion /Paul R. Gilliam III -- Bibliography /Paul R. Gilliam III -- Index of Modern Authors /Paul R. Gilliam III -- Index of Ancient Sources /Paul R. Gilliam III -- Index of Subjects /Paul R. Gilliam III. In Ignatius of Antioch and the Arian Controversy , Paul R. Gilliam III contends that the legacy of the second-century martyr Ignatius of Antioch was one battleground upon which Nicene and Non-Nicene personalities fought for their understanding of the relationship of the Son to the Father. It is well-know that Ignatius’ views continued to live on into the fourth century via the long recension of his letters. Gilliam, however, shows that there was much more to Ignatius’ fourth-century presence than the Ignatian long recension |
---|---|
Descrição Física: | 1 Online-Ressource |
ISBN: | 9004342885 |
Acesso: | Available to subscribing member institutions only |
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/9789004342880 |