Der Markus-Stoff Bei Lukas: Eine Literarkritische und Redaktionsgeschichtliche Untersuchung
Recent research on the Gospel of Luke has concentrated largely on the assumption that Mark's Gospel was Luke's exclusive source for the Markan tradition, and has therefore concluded that all deviations from Mark's Gospel within the Markan material used by Luke can be considered as Luk...
| 1. VerfasserIn: | |
|---|---|
| Medienart: | Elektronisch Buch |
| Sprache: | Deutsch |
| Subito Bestelldienst: | Jetzt bestellen. |
| Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Cambridge
Cambridge University Press
1971.
|
| In: | Jahr: 1971 |
| Schriftenreihe/Zeitschrift: | Society for New Testament Studies Monograph Series
14 |
| normierte Schlagwort(-folgen): | B
Bibel. Lukasevangelium
/ Redaktion
/ Geschichte
B Bibel. Lukasevangelium / Bibel. Markusevangelium |
| IxTheo Notationen: | HC Neues Testament |
| weitere Schlagwörter: | B
Bible. Mark
Criticism, interpretation, etc
B Bible. Luke Criticism, interpretation, etc B Bible ; Luke ; Criticism, interpretation, etc B Bible ; Mark ; Criticism, interpretation, etc |
| Online Zugang: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Parallele Ausgabe: | Nicht-Elektronisch
|
| Zusammenfassung: | Recent research on the Gospel of Luke has concentrated largely on the assumption that Mark's Gospel was Luke's exclusive source for the Markan tradition, and has therefore concluded that all deviations from Mark's Gospel within the Markan material used by Luke can be considered as Luke's own contribution. In this detailed analysis Dr Schramm points out that, in addition to his use of the Gospel of Mark in its extant form, Luke also drew on other oral or written traditions and concludes that where Luke shortened, augmented or modified his main source this was frequently due to the influence of variant traditions and should not in all cases be regarded as evidence of Luke's own theology. These conclusions show the necessity for a reconsideration of certain aspects of the so-called Lukan question and that 'Redaktionsgeschichte' must be more strongly linked with literary criticism. |
|---|---|
| Beschreibung: | Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 20 Jul 2016) |
| ISBN: | 0511659636 |
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511659638 |