A new vision of Jewish history: the early historical writings of Salo Baron

While rejecting the traditional belief that Jewish fate was controlled by God, nineteenth- and early twentieth-century historians of the Jews maintained prior perceptions of post-70 Jewish history as a sequence of unmitigated disasters. Beginning in 1928, the young Salo Baron combatted this perspect...

全面介紹

Saved in:  
書目詳細資料
Subtitles:Research Article
主要作者: Chazan, Robert Leon 1936-2024 (Author)
格式: 電子 Article
語言:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
載入...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
出版: University of Pennsylvania Press [2015]
In: AJS review
Year: 2015, 卷: 39, 發布: 1, Pages: 27-47
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Baron, Salo W. 1895-1989 / 猶太教 / 歷史 / 過去 / 意識形態 / / 命運
IxTheo Classification:BH Judaism
在線閱讀: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
實物特徵
總結:While rejecting the traditional belief that Jewish fate was controlled by God, nineteenth- and early twentieth-century historians of the Jews maintained prior perceptions of post-70 Jewish history as a sequence of unmitigated disasters. Beginning in 1928, the young Salo Baron combatted this perspective on the Jewish past, which he dubbed “the lachrymose conception of Jewish history.” In his well-known 1928 essay “Ghetto and Emancipation” and more substantially in the 1937 edition of his Social and Religious History of the Jews, Baron vigorously rejected this view. In the process, he formulated a new periodization of the Jewish past and moved beyond the ideologically grounded and programmatic reconstruction of Jewish history to a rigorously descriptive portrayal of the multi-faceted Jewish historical experience. In so doing, Baron laid the foundations of the flourishing contemporary Jewish historiographic enterprise.
ISSN:1475-4541
Contains:Enthalten in: Association for Jewish Studies, AJS review
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1017/S0364009414000634