Nahum and the greek tradition on Nineveh's fall
Greek tradition does not provide consistent and reliable evidence that an unusual inundation contributed to the fall of Nineveh. The Babylonian chronicles do not mention such an extraordinary event nor have archaeological excavations at Nineveh produced any evidence in support of such notion. Nineve...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | Recurso Electrónico Artigo |
| Idioma: | Inglês |
| Verificar disponibilidade: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Publicado em: |
2006
|
| Em: |
The journal of Hebrew scriptures
Ano: 2006, Volume: 6, Páginas: 2-16 |
| Classificações IxTheo: | BC Antigo Oriente ; Religião HB Antigo Testamento HH Arqueologia |
| Outras palavras-chave: | B
Ninive
B Bibel. Nahum B Xenophon (430 a.C.-354 a.C.) B Diodorus Siculus |
| Acesso em linha: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Resumo: | Greek tradition does not provide consistent and reliable evidence that an unusual inundation contributed to the fall of Nineveh. The Babylonian chronicles do not mention such an extraordinary event nor have archaeological excavations at Nineveh produced any evidence in support of such notion. Nineveh's topography precludes the possibility of significant flooding by the Khosr canal. The various verses in Nahum that have been construed as supporting flooding in Nineveh find a reasonable figurative interpretation within a contextual scheme that does not involve flooding. The notion that Nineveh was captured through flooding should be discarded. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1203-1542 |
| Obras secundárias: | Enthalten in: The journal of Hebrew scriptures
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.5508/jhs.2006.v6.a8 |
