L'analogia creationis di E. Przywara

The beginning of this contribution is a misunderstanding that was recorded by E. Przywara in 1955, and has been claimed since the 1920s, when he wrote his apologia to justify himself from the criticism that came from the theological world (in particular K. Barth and H. U. von Balthasar). According t...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Avogadri, Claudio (Author)
Format: Print Article
Language:Italian
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Glossa [2018]
In: Teologia
Year: 2018, Volume: 43, Issue: 2, Pages: 183-209
IxTheo Classification:KAJ Church history 1914-; recent history
KDB Roman Catholic Church
NBD Doctrine of Creation
NBF Christology

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1649693397
003 DE-627
005 20181206112131.0
007 tu
008 181206s2018 xx ||||| 00| ||ita c
035 |a (DE-627)1649693397 
035 |a (DE-576)514875569 
035 |a (DE-599)BSZ514875569 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a ita 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Avogadri, Claudio  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
109 |a Avogadri, Claudio 
245 1 2 |a L'analogia creationis di E. Przywara  |c Claudio Avogadri 
264 1 |c [2018] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen  |b n  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Band  |b nc  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The beginning of this contribution is a misunderstanding that was recorded by E. Przywara in 1955, and has been claimed since the 1920s, when he wrote his apologia to justify himself from the criticism that came from the theological world (in particular K. Barth and H. U. von Balthasar). According to Przywara, they hadn't understood his concept of analogia entis, as he really had sustained from the start of his research The purpose of this article is to once again give voice to Przywara, in order to discover the real intentions that have always led his work. We will find a new way to understand the concept of analogy, that cannot just be deciphered from the metaphysical point of view. For this hermeneutic we need the biblical notion of the relationship between God and his creature, both included as personal instances. This new matrix will change the classical interpretation of the epistemology of Przywara and will transform the way of understanding the three fundamentals axes of his thought: the conception of creation, the definition of negative theology and the comprehension of christology. (English) 
652 |a KAJ:KDB:NBD:NBF 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Teologia  |d Milano : Glossa, 1976  |g 43(2018), 2, Seite 183-209  |w (DE-627)166764094  |w (DE-600)303046-5  |w (DE-576)015202550  |x 1120-267X  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:43  |g year:2018  |g number:2  |g pages:183-209 
951 |a AR 
ELC |b 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3334193497 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1649693397 
LOK |0 005 20181211121833 
LOK |0 008 181206||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442049839  |a KDB 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442051531  |a NBD 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442051787  |a NBF 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442044640  |a KAJ 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw