Mysticism, evil, and Cleanthes’ dilemma
Hume’s Dialogues give one of the most elegant presentations of the Problem of Evil ever written. But often overlooked is that Hume’s problematic takes the form of a dilemma, with the traditional Problem representing only one horn. The other is what Hume calls ‘mysticism,’ a position that avoids the...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic/Print Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Taylor & Francis
[2015]
|
In: |
International journal of philosophy and theology
Year: 2015, Volume: 76, Issue: 1, Pages: 36-48 |
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Hume, David 1711-1776
/ Theism
/ Evil
/ Mysticism
B Hume, David 1711-1776 / Theodicy |
IxTheo Classification: | AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism NBC Doctrine of God |
Online Access: |
Volltext (doi) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000caa a2200000 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1647201152 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20200226130810.0 | ||
007 | tu | ||
008 | 160518s2015 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1080/21692327.2015.1053402 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1647201152 | ||
035 | |a (DE-576)469700793 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ469700793 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 0 |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1100538658 |0 (DE-627)859453871 |0 (DE-576)420616241 |4 aut |a Lorkowski, C. M. | |
109 | |a Lorkowski, C. M. |a Lorkowski, Chris Mickey |a Lorkowski, Chris M. | ||
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Mysticism, evil, and Cleanthes’ dilemma |c C.M. Lorkowski, University of Akron |
264 | 1 | |c [2015] | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Hume’s Dialogues give one of the most elegant presentations of the Problem of Evil ever written. But often overlooked is that Hume’s problematic takes the form of a dilemma, with the traditional Problem representing only one horn. The other is what Hume calls ‘mysticism,’ a position that avoids the Problem of Evil by maintaining that God is wholly other, and that God is therefore good in a fashion that mere humans simply cannot fathom. Mysticism is not the denial of God’s moral perfection defended by Philo’s positing of an indifferent deity. Nor is it an ad hoc final theistic entrenchment meant to stave off the Problem of Evil at any cost. Mysticism is, in fact, a position that Hume takes quite seriously and helped shape theism as it was practiced in Hume’s day. This paper studies Hume’s relationship with mysticism. First, it will recast the Problem of Evil as Hume intended, as only part of the larger theistic dilemma of choosing between anthropomorphism and mysticism. Once this polarization is understood and the respective consequences of adopting either of the two opposites is traced out, I locate Hume’s ‘genuine theism’ as significantly lying between these two extremes. | ||
601 | |a Dilemma | ||
652 | |a AB:NBC | ||
689 | 0 | 0 | |d p |0 (DE-588)118554735 |0 (DE-627)133789217 |0 (DE-576)20896522X |2 gnd |a Hume, David |d 1711-1776 |
689 | 0 | 1 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4059729-5 |0 (DE-627)10614250X |0 (DE-576)209131942 |2 gnd |a Theismus |
689 | 0 | 2 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4007524-2 |0 (DE-627)104162554 |0 (DE-576)208870830 |2 gnd |a Das Böse |
689 | 0 | 3 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4041003-1 |0 (DE-627)104559519 |0 (DE-576)209043008 |2 gnd |a Mystik |
689 | 0 | |5 (DE-627) | |
689 | 1 | 0 | |d p |0 (DE-588)118554735 |0 (DE-627)133789217 |0 (DE-576)20896522X |2 gnd |a Hume, David |d 1711-1776 |
689 | 1 | 1 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4059740-4 |0 (DE-627)104589558 |0 (DE-576)209132027 |2 gnd |a Theodizee |
689 | 1 | |5 (DE-627) | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t International journal of philosophy and theology |d Abingdon : Taylor & Francis, 2013 |g 76(2015), 1, Seite 36-48 |w (DE-627)731333977 |w (DE-600)2692944-2 |w (DE-576)381569306 |x 2169-2327 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:76 |g year:2015 |g number:1 |g pages:36-48 |
856 | |u https://doi.org/10.1080/21692327.2015.1053402 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
936 | u | w | |d 76 |j 2015 |e 1 |h 36-48 |
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 |b 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 3321937603 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1647201152 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20160523145841 | ||
LOK | |0 008 160518||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442042990 |a AB | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442051507 |a NBC | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
REL | |a 1 | ||
STA | 0 | 0 | |a Evil,Evil,Mysticism,Mysticism,Mysticism in literature,Mysticism in art,Mysticism and literature,Mysticism and poetry,Theism,Theodicy,Theodicy |
STB | 0 | 0 | |a Le mal,Mystique,Mystique,Mystique et littérature,Mystique et poésie,Théisme,Théodicée,Théodicée |
STC | 0 | 0 | |a El malo,Mística,Mística,Literatura mística,Misticismo,Misticismo,Teodicea,Teodicea,Teísmo |
STD | 0 | 0 | |a Il male,Mistica,Mistica,Teismo,Teodicea,Teodicea |
STE | 0 | 0 | |a 有神论,神义论,神义论,神正论,神正论,神秘主义,神秘主义,密契主义,密契主义,罪恶,恶,邪恶,罪恶,恶,邪恶 |
STF | 0 | 0 | |a 有神論,神秘主義,神秘主義,密契主義,密契主義,神義論,神義論,神正論,神正論,罪惡,惡,邪惡,罪惡,惡,邪惡 |
STG | 0 | 0 | |a Mística,Mística,O mal,Teodiceia,Teodiceia,Teísmo |
STH | 0 | 0 | |a Зло,Мистика (мотив),Мистика,Теизм,Теодицея (мотив),Теодицея |
STI | 0 | 0 | |a Θεοδικία (μοτίβο),Θεοδικία,Θεϊσμός,Μυστικισμός <μοτίβο>,Μυστικισμός,Αποκρυφισμός (μοτίβο),Το Κακό |
SUB | |a REL | ||
SYG | 0 | 0 | |a Hume, Dawid,1711-1776,Hume,1711-1776,D. H.,1711-1776,Hunius, David,1711-1776,Hsiu-mo, Ta-wei,1711-1776 , Das Böse , Hume, Dawid,1711-1776,Hume,1711-1776,D. H.,1711-1776,Hunius, David,1711-1776,Hsiu-mo, Ta-wei,1711-1776 |