Mysticism, evil, and Cleanthes’ dilemma

Hume’s Dialogues give one of the most elegant presentations of the Problem of Evil ever written. But often overlooked is that Hume’s problematic takes the form of a dilemma, with the traditional Problem representing only one horn. The other is what Hume calls ‘mysticism,’ a position that avoids the...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Lorkowski, C. M. (Author)
Format: Electronic/Print Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Taylor & Francis [2015]
In: International journal of philosophy and theology
Year: 2015, Volume: 76, Issue: 1, Pages: 36-48
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Hume, David 1711-1776 / Theism / Evil / Mysticism
B Hume, David 1711-1776 / Theodicy
IxTheo Classification:AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism
NBC Doctrine of God
Online Access: Volltext (doi)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a2200000 4500
001 1647201152
003 DE-627
005 20200226130810.0
007 tu
008 160518s2015 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1080/21692327.2015.1053402  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1647201152 
035 |a (DE-576)469700793 
035 |a (DE-599)BSZ469700793 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1100538658  |0 (DE-627)859453871  |0 (DE-576)420616241  |4 aut  |a Lorkowski, C. M. 
109 |a Lorkowski, C. M.  |a Lorkowski, Chris Mickey  |a Lorkowski, Chris M. 
245 1 0 |a Mysticism, evil, and Cleanthes’ dilemma  |c C.M. Lorkowski, University of Akron 
264 1 |c [2015] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen  |b n  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Band  |b nc  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Hume’s Dialogues give one of the most elegant presentations of the Problem of Evil ever written. But often overlooked is that Hume’s problematic takes the form of a dilemma, with the traditional Problem representing only one horn. The other is what Hume calls ‘mysticism,’ a position that avoids the Problem of Evil by maintaining that God is wholly other, and that God is therefore good in a fashion that mere humans simply cannot fathom. Mysticism is not the denial of God’s moral perfection defended by Philo’s positing of an indifferent deity. Nor is it an ad hoc final theistic entrenchment meant to stave off the Problem of Evil at any cost. Mysticism is, in fact, a position that Hume takes quite seriously and helped shape theism as it was practiced in Hume’s day. This paper studies Hume’s relationship with mysticism. First, it will recast the Problem of Evil as Hume intended, as only part of the larger theistic dilemma of choosing between anthropomorphism and mysticism. Once this polarization is understood and the respective consequences of adopting either of the two opposites is traced out, I locate Hume’s ‘genuine theism’ as significantly lying between these two extremes. 
601 |a Dilemma 
652 |a AB:NBC 
689 0 0 |d p  |0 (DE-588)118554735  |0 (DE-627)133789217  |0 (DE-576)20896522X  |2 gnd  |a Hume, David  |d 1711-1776 
689 0 1 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4059729-5  |0 (DE-627)10614250X  |0 (DE-576)209131942  |2 gnd  |a Theismus 
689 0 2 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4007524-2  |0 (DE-627)104162554  |0 (DE-576)208870830  |2 gnd  |a Das Böse 
689 0 3 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4041003-1  |0 (DE-627)104559519  |0 (DE-576)209043008  |2 gnd  |a Mystik 
689 0 |5 (DE-627) 
689 1 0 |d p  |0 (DE-588)118554735  |0 (DE-627)133789217  |0 (DE-576)20896522X  |2 gnd  |a Hume, David  |d 1711-1776 
689 1 1 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4059740-4  |0 (DE-627)104589558  |0 (DE-576)209132027  |2 gnd  |a Theodizee 
689 1 |5 (DE-627) 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t International journal of philosophy and theology  |d Abingdon : Taylor & Francis, 2013  |g 76(2015), 1, Seite 36-48  |w (DE-627)731333977  |w (DE-600)2692944-2  |w (DE-576)381569306  |x 2169-2327  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:76  |g year:2015  |g number:1  |g pages:36-48 
856 |u https://doi.org/10.1080/21692327.2015.1053402  |x doi  |3 Volltext 
936 u w |d 76  |j 2015  |e 1  |h 36-48 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1  |b 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3321937603 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1647201152 
LOK |0 005 20160523145841 
LOK |0 008 160518||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442042990  |a AB 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442051507  |a NBC 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
STA 0 0 |a Evil,Evil,Mysticism,Mysticism,Mysticism in literature,Mysticism in art,Mysticism and literature,Mysticism and poetry,Theism,Theodicy,Theodicy 
STB 0 0 |a Le mal,Mystique,Mystique,Mystique et littérature,Mystique et poésie,Théisme,Théodicée,Théodicée 
STC 0 0 |a El malo,Mística,Mística,Literatura mística,Misticismo,Misticismo,Teodicea,Teodicea,Teísmo 
STD 0 0 |a Il male,Mistica,Mistica,Teismo,Teodicea,Teodicea 
STE 0 0 |a 有神论,神义论,神义论,神正论,神正论,神秘主义,神秘主义,密契主义,密契主义,罪恶,恶,邪恶,罪恶,恶,邪恶 
STF 0 0 |a 有神論,神秘主義,神秘主義,密契主義,密契主義,神義論,神義論,神正論,神正論,罪惡,惡,邪惡,罪惡,惡,邪惡 
STG 0 0 |a Mística,Mística,O mal,Teodiceia,Teodiceia,Teísmo 
STH 0 0 |a Зло,Мистика (мотив),Мистика,Теизм,Теодицея (мотив),Теодицея 
STI 0 0 |a Θεοδικία (μοτίβο),Θεοδικία,Θεϊσμός,Μυστικισμός <μοτίβο>,Μυστικισμός,Αποκρυφισμός (μοτίβο),Το Κακό 
SUB |a REL 
SYG 0 0 |a Hume, Dawid,1711-1776,Hume,1711-1776,D. H.,1711-1776,Hunius, David,1711-1776,Hsiu-mo, Ta-wei,1711-1776 , Das Böse , Hume, Dawid,1711-1776,Hume,1711-1776,D. H.,1711-1776,Hunius, David,1711-1776,Hsiu-mo, Ta-wei,1711-1776