Arius: Twice a Heretic? Arius and the Human Soul of Jesus Christ
“Christology was an important element of the earliest Arianism.” So states Raven in the introductory chapters to his study of apollinarianism. This paper will consider the christology of the “earliest′ Arians,” in particular that of Arius himself. Christology has been defined as “the study of the Pe...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic/Print Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Cambridge University Press
[1960]
|
| In: |
Church history
Year: 1960, Volume: 29, Issue: 3, Pages: 251-263 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (doi) |
| Parallel Edition: | Electronic
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1647176778 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20160620111759.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 160509s1960 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.2307/3162210 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1647176778 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-576)469384182 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ469384182 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Haugaard, William P. |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Arius |b Twice a Heretic? Arius and the Human Soul of Jesus Christ |c William P. Haugaard |
| 264 | 1 | |c [1960] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a “Christology was an important element of the earliest Arianism.” So states Raven in the introductory chapters to his study of apollinarianism. This paper will consider the christology of the “earliest′ Arians,” in particular that of Arius himself. Christology has been defined as “the study of the Person of Christ, and in particular of the union in Him of the Divine and human natures.” In the latter “particular” sense, we shall conclude that Arius really had no developed christology. This is not to say, however, that Arius was not christologically concerned in the larger sense of the word; i.e., “the study of the Person of Christ.” It is true to say after Dorner that:We should be very greatly mistaken … if we were to suppose that the Christological labours had meanwhile been totally suspended: on the contrary, in the case of the thinkers of the Church, Christology was the perennial motive of their trinitarian efforts. | ||
| 601 | |a Jesus Christ | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Church history |d Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 1932 |g 29(1960), 3, Seite 251-263 |w (DE-627)129068306 |w (DE-600)1533-7 |w (DE-576)014399822 |x 0009-6407 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:29 |g year:1960 |g number:3 |g pages:251-263 |
| 776 | |i Erscheint auch als |n elektronische Ausgabe |w (DE-627)1779552076 |k Electronic | ||
| 856 | |u https://doi.org/10.2307/3162210 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 |b 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 3321864495 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1647176778 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20160509122602 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 160509||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzo | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||