The Earliest Text of the Old Roman Symbol: A Debate with Hans Lietzmann and J. N. D. Kelly
One of the curiosities of the scholarly enterprise is the fact that often what tends to advance the handling and interpretation of data with respect to one problem has the side effect of preventing adequate and imaginative treatment of related problems. This appears to be the case in recent creedal...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic/Print Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Cambridge University Press
[1965]
|
In: |
Church history
Year: 1965, Volume: 34, Issue: 3, Pages: 262-281 |
Online Access: |
Volltext (doi) |
Parallel Edition: | Electronic
|
Summary: | One of the curiosities of the scholarly enterprise is the fact that often what tends to advance the handling and interpretation of data with respect to one problem has the side effect of preventing adequate and imaginative treatment of related problems. This appears to be the case in recent creedal research. The question of the earliest text of vetus symbolum romanum has been obscured, rather than clarified, by the important recognition at the hands of many scholars of the richness and variety of creedal data surviving from the second century. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0009-6407 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Church history
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.2307/3162802 |