Conciliarism at the Fifth Lateran Council?

Conciliarism at the Fifth Lateran Council? Despite the current interest in things conciliar this is a strange and, no doubt to some, a rather forced juxta position. For what, after all, is there to be said about it? The council may indeed have been a great non-event in the religious history of the s...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Oakley, Francis 1931- (Author)
Format: Electronic/Print Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Cambridge University Press [1972]
In: Church history
Year: 1972, Volume: 41, Issue: 4, Pages: 452-463
IxTheo Classification:KAG Church history 1500-1648; Reformation; humanism; Renaissance
Online Access: Volltext (doi)
Parallel Edition:Electronic

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1647114853
003 DE-627
005 20160620102112.0
007 tu
008 160421s1972 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.2307/3163876  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1647114853 
035 |a (DE-576)468892826 
035 |a (DE-599)BSZ468892826 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)172292530  |0 (DE-627)697201805  |0 (DE-576)162416504  |4 aut  |a Oakley, Francis  |d 1931- 
109 |a Oakley, Francis 1931-  |a Oakley, Francis Christopher 1931- 
245 1 0 |a Conciliarism at the Fifth Lateran Council? 
264 1 |c [1972] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen  |b n  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Band  |b nc  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Conciliarism at the Fifth Lateran Council? Despite the current interest in things conciliar this is a strange and, no doubt to some, a rather forced juxta position. For what, after all, is there to be said about it? The council may indeed have been a great non-event in the religious history of the sixteenth century but it was surely a highly papalist non-event. Was it not, in form and procedure, a faithful copy of the papal general councils of the pre-Conciliar era—of Lateran IV (1215), of Lyons (1274), of Vienne (1311)? To what did it owe its convocation if not the desire of Julius II to cut the ground from under the feet of the dissident conciliabulum of Pisa (1511–12)—itself, of course, summoned by the cardinals of the opposition with the support of the French king and very much a conciliarist's council? Were not the first half-dozen sessions occupied almost exclusively with the condemnation of the activities of that council, the proscription of those who persisted in adhering to it and the reconciliation of those who had abandoned it? Did not the eleventh session witness the definitive rejection of the Pragmatic Sanction of Bourges, the base from which for so long conciliarist thinkers had been able to operate with impunity? Did it not witness also the unambiguous assertion of the superiority of pope to council, and was not this principle underlined in practice by the craven responsiveness of the council fathers to papal demands? And so on. It is easy enough to envisage the questions, the queries, the dissents. 
652 |a KAG 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Church history  |d Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 1932  |g 41(1972), 4, Seite 452-463  |w (DE-627)129068306  |w (DE-600)1533-7  |w (DE-576)014399822  |x 0009-6407  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:41  |g year:1972  |g number:4  |g pages:452-463 
776 |i Erscheint auch als  |n elektronische Ausgabe  |w (DE-627)1779561393  |k Electronic 
856 |u https://doi.org/10.2307/3163876  |x doi  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1  |b 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3321699192 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1647114853 
LOK |0 005 20160421121838 
LOK |0 008 160421||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzo 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442044608  |a KAG 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw