Religious Orthodoxy, Dissent and Suppression in Venice in the 1540s

In his book Venice and the Defense of Republican Liberty: Renaissance Values in the Age of the Counter Reformation (Berkely, 1968), William J. Bouwsma claims that the confrontation between Rome and Venice in the sixteenth and early seventeenth centuries was based on two different views of the world....

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Santosuosso, Antonio (Author)
Format: Electronic/Print Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Cambridge University Press [1973]
In: Church history
Year: 1973, Volume: 42, Issue: 4, Pages: 476-485
IxTheo Classification:KAG Church history 1500-1648; Reformation; humanism; Renaissance
KBJ Italy
Online Access: Volltext (doi)
Parallel Edition:Electronic

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1647111986
003 DE-627
005 20160620095044.0
007 tu
008 160421s1973 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.2307/3164968  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1647111986 
035 |a (DE-576)468876464 
035 |a (DE-599)BSZ468876464 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Santosuosso, Antonio  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Religious Orthodoxy, Dissent and Suppression in Venice in the 1540s 
264 1 |c [1973] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen  |b n  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Band  |b nc  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a In his book Venice and the Defense of Republican Liberty: Renaissance Values in the Age of the Counter Reformation (Berkely, 1968), William J. Bouwsma claims that the confrontation between Rome and Venice in the sixteenth and early seventeenth centuries was based on two different views of the world. He sees Rome as the embodiment of the authoritarianism and intolerance of the Counter Reformation and Venice as the last representative of Renaissance republicanism. Bouwsma maintains that the struggle which reached a point of crisis during the interdict of 1606-1607 was a logical development of an inborn ideological conflict between Venice and Rome. His thesis, however, does not fit the facts for the 1540s, which were a crucial decade in Venetian history since these years witnessed the acceptance of the Roman Inquisition and the first attempt to adopt an Index of Forbidden Books. During this period, Rome and Venice disagreed not on what should be implemented or rejected, but on who should have the responsibility and weaponry to enforce it. When there was a confrontation between them, it was caused by reasons of state—the political needs of two governments sharing a common border and having different political interests in Italy and/or in Europe. 
601 |a Dissenters 
652 |a KAG:KBJ 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Church history  |d Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 1932  |g 42(1973), 4, Seite 476-485  |w (DE-627)129068306  |w (DE-600)1533-7  |w (DE-576)014399822  |x 0009-6407  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:42  |g year:1973  |g number:4  |g pages:476-485 
776 |i Erscheint auch als  |n elektronische Ausgabe  |w (DE-627)1779562233  |k Electronic 
856 |u https://doi.org/10.2307/3164968  |x doi  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1  |b 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3321692651 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1647111986 
LOK |0 005 20160421094219 
LOK |0 008 160421||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzo 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442048786  |a KBJ 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442044608  |a KAG 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw