Eine vormasoretische Textaneignung in der Hoseaschrift?
In all addresses of Hosea there are only four (Hos 2,8.18; 9,10; 10,9) of MT not testified by LXX, but one (Hos 2,20) of LXX not testified by MT. Because of their special intentions these differences of tradition can be understood as an adaption of the written text of Hosea to the historical situati...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Print Article |
Language: | German |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Herder
2009
|
In: |
Biblische Notizen
Year: 2009, Volume: 142, Pages: 33-37 |
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Hosea
/ Text history
B Old Testament / Textual criticism |
IxTheo Classification: | HB Old Testament |
Further subjects: | B
Bible. Altes Testament Septuaginta
B Bible. Hosea 2,8 B Bible. Hosea 9,10 B Bible. Hosea 10,9 |
Summary: | In all addresses of Hosea there are only four (Hos 2,8.18; 9,10; 10,9) of MT not testified by LXX, but one (Hos 2,20) of LXX not testified by MT. Because of their special intentions these differences of tradition can be understood as an adaption of the written text of Hosea to the historical situation of jewish people in Palestine (MT) and abroad (LXX) in the last centuries BCE. Hos 2,8.18; 9,10; 10,9 zeigt MT abweichend von LXX eine direkte Anrede mit hörerkritischem Inhalt. Hos 2,20 zeigt LXX abweichend von MT eine direkte Anrede mit hoffnungweisendem Inhalt. Diese Unterschiede sollen als Ausdruck frühjüdischer Aneignung des überlieferten Textes in Israel bzw. der Diaspora verstanden werden. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0178-2967 |
Contains: | In: Biblische Notizen
|