Halakah and Mark 7.4: "... and beds"

This article argues that the textually problematic kai klinōn in Mk 7,4 reflects a first-century Jewish practice of immersing dining couches. This practice was not based on the "beds" described in Lev. 15. The immersion of dining couches is attested in rabbinic literature and was based in...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Crossley, James G. 1973- (Author)
Format: Print Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Sage 2003
In: Journal for the study of the New Testament
Year: 2003, Volume: 25, Issue: 4, Pages: 433-447
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Bible. Markusevangelium 7,4 / Textual criticism
B New Testament / Law (Theology)
IxTheo Classification:HC New Testament
Further subjects:B Halacha
B Bible. Markusevangelium 7,4
Description
Summary:This article argues that the textually problematic kai klinōn in Mk 7,4 reflects a first-century Jewish practice of immersing dining couches. This practice was not based on the "beds" described in Lev. 15. The immersion of dining couches is attested in rabbinic literature and was based in passages that mention the immersion of impure objects (Lev. 11.32; 15.12). This is shown through a discussion of various words used for "bed" in the relevant literature in Greek, Hebrew, Aramaic and Syriac. Some consideration is given to text-critical issues concluding that kai klinōn is the original reading. As Mark accurately reflects a Jewish practice, it is suggested that the traditional view of the author of Mark as lacking knowledge of Jewish practices ought to be abandoned and the view that the author of Mark was a Jew absorbed in the intricacies of Jewish Law ought to be taken very seriously.
ISSN:0142-064X
Contains:In: Journal for the study of the New Testament