Chrononormativity and the community of character: a queer temporal critique of Hauerwasian virtue ethics
This essay critically examines Stanley Hauerwas’ ecclesial-based virtue ethics, arguing that his account of formation risks foreclosing differences that exist within Christian community. Placing Hauerwas’ virtue ethical framework in conversation with queer theoretical work on temporality, turning to...
| 發表在: | Theology & sexuality |
|---|---|
| 主要作者: | |
| 格式: | Electronic/Print Article |
| 語言: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | 載入...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| 出版: |
Taylor & Francis
[2017]
|
| In: |
Theology & sexuality
|
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Hauerwas, Stanley 1940-
/ Freeman, Elizabeth 1968-
/ Muñoz, José Esteban 1967-2013
/ Tanner, Kathryn 1957-
/ Bonhoeffer, Dietrich 1906-1945
/ Wertethik
/ 酷儿理论
|
| IxTheo Classification: | CH Christianity and Society KDD Protestant Church KDG Free church NCA Ethics |
| Further subjects: | B
queer temporality
B Kathryn Tanner B Stanley Hauerwas B Dietrich Bonhoeffer B Elizabeth Freeman B Formation B Virtue Ethics B José Esteban Muñoz |
| 在線閱讀: |
Volltext (doi) |
| Parallel Edition: | 電子
|
| 總結: | This essay critically examines Stanley Hauerwas’ ecclesial-based virtue ethics, arguing that his account of formation risks foreclosing differences that exist within Christian community. Placing Hauerwas’ virtue ethical framework in conversation with queer theoretical work on temporality, turning to Elizabeth Freeman’s notion of chrononormativity and José Esteban Munoz’s critique of straight time, and with Kathryn Tanner’s theological work on culture, this essay demonstrates how Hauerwas’ account narrowly assumes what community and character does and should look like, and in doing so relies upon and reproduces a logic that undermines and ultimately oppresses difference - through assimilation, normalization, and exclusion. This essay also explores constructive resources queer temporality might offer for a virtue ethical framework that avoids difference-foreclosing normalization. Placing Muñoz in conversation with Dietrich Bonhoeffer, this essay proposes an apophatic anti-telos that shifts focus from a prescriptive telos seeking success and stability to a horizon of eros and encounter. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1355-8358 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Theology & sexuality
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/13558358.2017.1341208 |