Chrononormativity and the community of character: a queer temporal critique of Hauerwasian virtue ethics
This essay critically examines Stanley Hauerwas’ ecclesial-based virtue ethics, arguing that his account of formation risks foreclosing differences that exist within Christian community. Placing Hauerwas’ virtue ethical framework in conversation with queer theoretical work on temporality, turning to...
| Pubblicato in: | Theology & sexuality |
|---|---|
| Autore principale: | |
| Tipo di documento: | Digitale/Stampa Articolo |
| Lingua: | Inglese |
| Verificare la disponibilità: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Caricamento...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Pubblicazione: |
Taylor & Francis
[2017]
|
| In: |
Theology & sexuality
|
| (sequenze di) soggetti normati: | B
Hauerwas, Stanley 1940-
/ Freeman, Elizabeth 1968-
/ Muñoz, José Esteban 1967-2013
/ Tanner, Kathryn 1957-
/ Bonhoeffer, Dietrich 1906-1945
/ Etica dei valori
/ Teoria queer
|
| Notazioni IxTheo: | CH Cristianesimo e società KDD Chiesa evangelica KDG Chiese libere NCA Etica |
| Altre parole chiave: | B
queer temporality
B Kathryn Tanner B Stanley Hauerwas B Dietrich Bonhoeffer B Elizabeth Freeman B Formation B Virtue Ethics B José Esteban Muñoz |
| Accesso online: |
Volltext (doi) |
| Edizione parallela: | Elettronico
|
| Riepilogo: | This essay critically examines Stanley Hauerwas’ ecclesial-based virtue ethics, arguing that his account of formation risks foreclosing differences that exist within Christian community. Placing Hauerwas’ virtue ethical framework in conversation with queer theoretical work on temporality, turning to Elizabeth Freeman’s notion of chrononormativity and José Esteban Munoz’s critique of straight time, and with Kathryn Tanner’s theological work on culture, this essay demonstrates how Hauerwas’ account narrowly assumes what community and character does and should look like, and in doing so relies upon and reproduces a logic that undermines and ultimately oppresses difference - through assimilation, normalization, and exclusion. This essay also explores constructive resources queer temporality might offer for a virtue ethical framework that avoids difference-foreclosing normalization. Placing Muñoz in conversation with Dietrich Bonhoeffer, this essay proposes an apophatic anti-telos that shifts focus from a prescriptive telos seeking success and stability to a horizon of eros and encounter. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1355-8358 |
| Comprende: | Enthalten in: Theology & sexuality
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/13558358.2017.1341208 |