Gud og det givne: om diskursiv teisme
Resumé Two important preconditions for the thinking of God in contemporary philosophy of religion are Kant’s critique of the ontological argument and Heidegger’s critique of so-called onto-theology. In both cases we find a critique of metaphysics and in both cases the concept of being or existence i...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Print Article |
| Language: | Danish |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Anis
[2017]
|
| In: |
Dansk teologisk tidsskrift
Year: 2017, Volume: 80, Issue: 2/3, Pages: 127-145 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
God
/ Being
/ Phenomenology
/ Religious language
|
| IxTheo Classification: | AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism NBC Doctrine of God |
| Further subjects: | B
Phenomenology
B Theism B Postmetaphysics B Religious Language B Onto-theology |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a2200000 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1639701176 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20171107103922.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 171030s2017 xx ||||| 00| ||dan c | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1639701176 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-576)494873795 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ494873795 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a dan | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)122371267 |0 (DE-627)081904789 |0 (DE-576)160075653 |4 aut |a Andersen, Svend |d 1948- | |
| 109 | |a Andersen, Svend 1948- | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Gud og det givne |b om diskursiv teisme |c Professor dr.theol. Svend Andersen |
| 264 | 1 | |c [2017] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Resumé Two important preconditions for the thinking of God in contemporary philosophy of religion are Kant’s critique of the ontological argument and Heidegger’s critique of so-called onto-theology. In both cases we find a critique of metaphysics and in both cases the concept of being or existence is central. Against this background, the article discusses the thinking about God in K.E. Løgstup and Jean-Luc Marion, who both relate to Heidegger’s thought and to phenomenology. Other contributions are included, viz. Johannes Sløk’s and Niels Grønkjær’s. The main thesis is that there can be no ‘unbroken’ discourse about God in the context of a Heideggerian Seinsdenken. Language is a necessary intermediate: the transition from the sphere of being to God as a person presupposes linguistic discourse. Such a discursive theism is not vulnerable to the contemporary critique of metaphysics. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Religious Language | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Phenomenology | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Onto-theology | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Postmetaphysics | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Theism | |
| 652 | |a AB:NBC | ||
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4021662-7 |0 (DE-627)104649747 |0 (DE-576)208939261 |2 gnd |a Gott |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4054329-8 |0 (DE-627)106163132 |0 (DE-576)209108266 |2 gnd |a Sein |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4045660-2 |0 (DE-627)106200755 |0 (DE-576)209066334 |2 gnd |a Phänomenologie |
| 689 | 0 | 3 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4049386-6 |0 (DE-627)104682655 |0 (DE-576)209081872 |2 gnd |a Religiöse Sprache |
| 689 | 0 | |5 (DE-627) | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Dansk teologisk tidsskrift |d Frederiksberg : Anis, 1938 |g 80(2017), 2/3, Seite 127-145 |w (DE-627)166747254 |w (DE-600)300166-0 |w (DE-576)015178161 |x 0105-3191 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:80 |g year:2017 |g number:2/3 |g pages:127-145 |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 80 |j 2017 |e 2/3 |h 127-145 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |b 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 3300591597 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1639701176 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20171107103922 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 171030||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2020-03-05#200CCA9030AB5B52C1044CC8F3EAE21C8660A028 | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a zota | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442042990 |a AB | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442051507 |a NBC | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| STA | 0 | 0 | |a Being,God,God,Phenomenology,Religious language |
| STB | 0 | 0 | |a Dieu,Dieu,Langage religieux,Phénoménologie,Être,Essence,Essence |
| STC | 0 | 0 | |a Dios,Dios,Fenomenología,Lenguaje religiosa,Ser |
| STD | 0 | 0 | |a Dio,Dio,Essere,Fenomenologia,Linguaggio religioso |
| STE | 0 | 0 | |a 存有,宗教语言,宗教用语,现象学,神,神,上帝,上帝 |
| STF | 0 | 0 | |a 存有,宗教語言,宗教用語,現象學,神,神,上帝,上帝 |
| STG | 0 | 0 | |a Deus,Deus,Fenomenologia,Linguagem religiosa,Ser |
| STH | 0 | 0 | |a Бог (мотив),Бог,Религиозный язык,Существование,Феноменология |
| STI | 0 | 0 | |a Ύπαρξη,Θεός (μοτίβο),Θεός,Θρησκευτική γλώσσα,Φαινομενολογία |
| SUB | |a REL | ||
| SYG | 0 | 0 | |a Playing God |