Love as power and powerlessness: Kierkegaard and Adorno revisited
This article defends the ongoing relevance of Adorno's criticism of Kierkegaard's Works of Love, despite the fact that many Kierkegaard scholars dismiss it. To support this claim, the discussion shows how issues at the heart of Adorno's critique resurface in contemporary debates over...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic/Print Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
University of Toronto Press
[2017]
|
In: |
Toronto journal of theology
Year: 2017, Volume: 33, Issue: 1, Pages: 43-62 |
IxTheo Classification: | KAH Church history 1648-1913; modern history KAJ Church history 1914-; recent history VA Philosophy |
Online Access: |
Volltext (doi) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000naa a2200000 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1639039406 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20170823171723.0 | ||
007 | tu | ||
008 | 170823s2017 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.3138/tjt.2016-0014 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1639039406 | ||
035 | |a (DE-576)492682615 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ492682615 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)142333042 |0 (DE-627)635540592 |0 (DE-576)330163663 |4 aut |a Brittain, Christopher Craig | |
109 | |a Brittain, Christopher Craig |a Brittain, Christopher C. | ||
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Love as power and powerlessness |b Kierkegaard and Adorno revisited |c Christopher Craig Brittain |
264 | 1 | |c [2017] | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a This article defends the ongoing relevance of Adorno's criticism of Kierkegaard's Works of Love, despite the fact that many Kierkegaard scholars dismiss it. To support this claim, the discussion shows how issues at the heart of Adorno's critique resurface in contemporary debates over Kierkegaard's distinction between preferential and non-preferential love. This is particularly evident in Krishek's debate with Ferreira. The article argues that the repair Krishek proposes to Kierkegaard's account falls short of Adorno's insistence on the significance of social context. This issue is drawn out by contrasting Krishek's emphasis on caring compassion with Adorno's preference for concepts such as reconciliation and justice. The discussion subsequently acknowledges that Adorno's own account of subjectivity remains inadequate in ways that recall issues he criticizes in Kierkegaard's philosophy. Potential resources in Adorno's thought are drawn out from some of his aphorisms on the power of love. | ||
652 | |a KAH:KAJ:VA | ||
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Toronto journal of theology |d Toronto, Ontario : University of Toronto Press, 1985 |g 33(2017), 1, Seite 43-62 |w (DE-627)169136663 |w (DE-600)896191-8 |w (DE-576)016232429 |x 0826-9831 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:33 |g year:2017 |g number:1 |g pages:43-62 |
856 | |u https://doi.org/ 10.3138/tjt.2016-0014 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
936 | u | w | |d 33 |j 2017 |e 1 |h 43-62 |
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 |b 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 329921585X | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1639039406 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20170828141849 | ||
LOK | |0 008 170823||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a gkix | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442053844 |a VA | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442044624 |a KAH | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442044640 |a KAJ | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
REL | |a 1 | ||
SUB | |a REL |