The conscience of the African Church in the Synod on the Family and "Amoris laetitia"
Different perceptions and evaluations have appeared on the role and influence of the African bishops – and therefore the African church – in the recent two-stage process of synod on the family, held consecutively in Rome in 2014 and 2015. From outside of the continent, two reactions have been promin...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic/Print Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Peeters
[2016]
|
| In: |
INTAMS review
Year: 2016, Volume: 22, Issue: 2, Pages: 154-168 |
| IxTheo Classification: | KAJ Church history 1914-; recent history KBN Sub-Saharan Africa KCC Councils KDB Roman Catholic Church NCF Sexual ethics RB Church office; congregation |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (doi) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a2200000 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1637388586 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20170425085259.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 170425s2016 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.2143/INT.22.2.3194498 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1637388586 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-576)486884201 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ486884201 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)133565211 |0 (DE-627)548757313 |0 (DE-576)17291132X |4 aut |a Magesa, Laurenti |d 1946-2022 | |
| 109 | |a Magesa, Laurenti 1946-2022 | ||
| 245 | 1 | 4 | |a The conscience of the African Church in the Synod on the Family and "Amoris laetitia" |c Laurenti Magesa |
| 264 | 1 | |c [2016] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Different perceptions and evaluations have appeared on the role and influence of the African bishops – and therefore the African church – in the recent two-stage process of synod on the family, held consecutively in Rome in 2014 and 2015. From outside of the continent, two reactions have been prominent: one lauding the African church as 'defender of the faith' concerning the meaning and structure of Christian marriage. The other view lumps the position(s) taken by many of the African bishops at the synod as doctrinally ultra-rigorist or 'conservative'. It sees the African position as outdated and out of touch with contemporary social and theological reality on sexuality and marriage. The prevailing view in the second perception seems to be that the Africans concentrated too narrowly on only two issues, considered by them to be largely 'Western' or 'European' concerns: namely, how, pastorally, to approach divorced and remarried Catholics and people of homosexual tendencies and relationships. Assessments both in favour of or against the African responses and contribution to the synod, therefore, have largely been based on the African bishops’ reactions on these issues. But, as this contribution argues, a wider, more comprehensive view of the African responses indicates that, without being oblivious to the global church’s current preoccupation with divorce and remarriage and gay unions, the African bishops had their churches’ pastoral welfare at heart, regardless of their sometimes diverse interpretations of these interests. The question, however, is how successful they were at articulating these interests during the synodal process. Given the more advanced sophistication in the theological and public-relations capability of the Western churches compared to those of the African representatives, did the African voice make itself heard in the synod? How much of it is reflected in Pope Francis’ Apostolic Exhortation, Amoris laetitia? In the context of the integrity of the African Church, these complexities call for some clarification. | ||
| 652 | |a KAJ:KBN:KCC:KDB:NCF:RB | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |a International Academy of Marital Spirituality |t INTAMS review |d Leuven : Peeters, 1995 |g 22(2016), 2, Seite 154-168 |w (DE-627)196349206 |w (DE-600)1312818-8 |w (DE-576)054531918 |x 1370-6020 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:22 |g year:2016 |g number:2 |g pages:154-168 |
| 856 | |u https://doi.org/10.2143/INT.22.2.3194498 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 |b 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 3295692378 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1637388586 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20170503122308 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 170425||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442049022 |a KBN | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442049839 |a KDB | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442049618 |a KCC | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 144205302X |a RB | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442052961 |a NCF | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442044640 |a KAJ | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||