RT Article
T1 Løgstrups kristologi og den anden jagt på den historiske Jesus
JF Dansk teologisk tidsskrift
VO 76
IS 4
SP 291
OP 311
A1 Odgaard Møller, Maria Louise
LA Danish
PB Anis
YR 2013
UL https://ixtheo.de/Record/1637133073
AB Resumé This article examines whether K.E. Løgstrup’s Christology iscompatible with the “implicit Christology” of Bultmann and his students.In their ongoing discussion about the relationship between thehistorical Jesus and Christ of the kerygma, Bultmann holds an extremeposition, refusing to credit the historical Jesus with any meaning forChristian faith but the mere fact that he once lived. His implicit Christological traits are explicated in the confession, and therefore, this kind of “implicit Christology” is formed as a movement from law to gospel.Against this view, Käsemann and Bornkamm wish to ascribe the historicalJesus with a more pivotal meaning upon faith, because of themessianic traits of his life and preaching. Løgstrup’s Christology is athoroughly human Christology, since Jesus is Christ by being the truehuman being. Løgstrup then holds the opposite extreme position; bothbeginning and ending with the human being Jesus of Nazareth. Therefore,Løgstrup’s Christology is something quite unique and Løgtrupian.
K1 K.E. Løgstrup
K1 Günther Bornkamm
K1 Ernst Käsemann
K1 Rudolf Bultmann
K1 Christ of the kerygma
K1 The historical Jesus
K1 “Neue Frage”
K1 Implicit Christology