Recent objections to perfect knowledge and classical approaches to omniscience
Patrick Grim and Einar Duenger Bohn have recently argued that there can be no perfectly knowing Being. In particular, they urge that the object of omniscience is logically absurd (Grim) or requires an impossible maximal point of all knowledge (Bohn). I argue that, given a more classical notion of om...
| 主要作者: | |
|---|---|
| 格式: | Electronic/Print Article |
| 語言: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | 載入...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| 出版: |
Marquette Univ. Press
[2016]
|
| In: |
Philosophy & theology
Year: 2016, 卷: 28, 發布: 1, Pages: 259-270 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Grim, Patrick
/ 神
/ 知識
|
| IxTheo Classification: | AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism KAJ Church history 1914-; recent history |
| 在線閱讀: |
Volltext (doi) |
| 總結: | Patrick Grim and Einar Duenger Bohn have recently argued that there can be no perfectly knowing Being. In particular, they urge that the object of omniscience is logically absurd (Grim) or requires an impossible maximal point of all knowledge (Bohn). I argue that, given a more classical notion of omniscience found in Aquinas and Augustine, we can shift the focus of perfect knowledge from what that being must know to the mode of that being’s understanding. Since Grim and Bohn focus on the object rather than mode of God’s knowledge, this classical approach to omniscience undermines their objections. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0890-2461 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Philosophy & theology
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.5840/philtheol20167553 |