Mind the (unbridgeable) gaps: a cautionary tale about pseudoscientific distortions and scientific misconceptions in the study of religion

In this paper, I explore two of the most pernicious kinds of scientific distortions and misconceptions pertinent to the study of religion (i.e., pseudoscientific trends focused on allegedly paranormal/supernatural phenomena and discontinuity between human and non-human cognition), arguing that: a) t...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Method & theory in the study of religion
Main Author: Ambasciano, Leonardo (Author)
Format: Print Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Brill [2016]
In: Method & theory in the study of religion
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Kognitive Religionswissenschaft / Natural sciences / Pseudo-science / Evolution
IxTheo Classification:AA Study of religion
AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism
AE Psychology of religion
Further subjects:B Cognitive Science
B Anthropocentrism
B Religion Study & teaching
B Science
B Evolution
B cognitive science of religion
B Pseudoscience
B history of religions
B paranormal

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a2200000 4500
001 1636284191
003 DE-627
005 20190417122030.0
007 tu
008 170118s2016 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c
035 |a (DE-627)1636284191 
035 |a (DE-576)481853693 
035 |a (DE-599)BSZ481853693 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1076044395  |0 (DE-627)834213478  |0 (DE-576)398252939  |4 aut  |a Ambasciano, Leonardo 
109 |a Ambasciano, Leonardo 
245 1 0 |a Mind the (unbridgeable) gaps  |b a cautionary tale about pseudoscientific distortions and scientific misconceptions in the study of religion  |c Leonardo Ambasciano, Independent researcher, PhD in Historical Studies 
264 1 |c [2016] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen  |b n  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Band  |b nc  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a In this paper, I explore two of the most pernicious kinds of scientific distortions and misconceptions pertinent to the study of religion (i.e., pseudoscientific trends focused on allegedly paranormal/supernatural phenomena and discontinuity between human and non-human cognition), arguing that: a) the adherence to the prestigious reputation of Eliadean academic frameworks may still cause grave distortions in the comprehension of relevant scientific fields; b) a reliance on cognition alone does not guarantee ipso facto a more epistemically warranted study of religion; c) an evolutionary and cognitively continuist approach to the study of religion is, instead, the most promising and fundamental scholarly tool to bridge the gap between the humanities and the natural sciences, even though it remains a long-term goal; d) the obsolete language of "aboriginal cultures" as open-air museums for our past is rooted in the aforementioned misconceptions and, though basically flawed, is still very much alive. 
601 |a Religion 
650 4 |a Anthropocentrism 
650 4 |a Cognitive Science 
650 4 |a cognitive science of religion 
650 4 |a Evolution 
650 4 |a history of religions 
650 4 |a paranormal 
650 4 |a Pseudoscience 
650 4 |a Religion  |x Study & teaching 
650 4 |a Science 
652 |a AA:AB:AE 
689 0 0 |d s  |0 (DE-588)1153645505  |0 (DE-627)1015151884  |0 (DE-576)500375216  |2 gnd  |a Kognitive Religionswissenschaft 
689 0 1 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4041421-8  |0 (DE-627)106219324  |0 (DE-576)209044837  |2 gnd  |a Naturwissenschaften 
689 0 2 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4278343-4  |0 (DE-627)104410647  |0 (DE-576)210734876  |2 gnd  |a Pseudowissenschaft 
689 0 3 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4071050-6  |0 (DE-627)106098691  |0 (DE-576)209182741  |2 gnd  |a Evolution 
689 0 |5 (DE-627) 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Method & theory in the study of religion  |d Leiden [u.a.] : Brill, 1989  |g 28(2016), 2, Seite 141-225  |w (DE-627)170624080  |w (DE-600)1082966-0  |w (DE-576)026374846  |x 0943-3058  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:28  |g year:2016  |g number:2  |g pages:141-225 
936 u w |d 28  |j 2016  |e 2  |h 141-225 
951 |a AR 
ELC |b 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3293511198 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1636284191 
LOK |0 005 20170124162913 
LOK |0 008 170118||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442042966  |a AA 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442042990  |a AB 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442043024  |a AE 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
STA 0 0 |a Evolution,Evolution,Natural sciences,Natural sciences,Natural science,Science in literature,Pseudo-science,Religion,Religion in literature,Religions,Religion 
STB 0 0 |a Pseudoscience,Religion,Religions,Religion,Sciences de la nature,Sciences de la nature,Sciences,Sciences,Sciences (motif),Sciences,Évolution,Évolution 
STC 0 0 |a Ciencias naturales,Ciencias naturales,Evolución,Pseudo-ciencia,Religión,Religión,Religión 
STD 0 0 |a Evoluzione,Pseudoscienza,Religione,Religione,Religione,Scienze naturali,Scienze naturali 
STE 0 0 |a 宗教,宗教,自然科学,自然科学,进化,演变 
STF 0 0 |a 伪科学,宗教,宗教,自然科學,自然科學,進化,演變 
STG 0 0 |a Ciências naturais,Ciências naturais,Evolução,Pseudo-ciência,Religião,Religião 
STH 0 0 |a Естественные науки (мотив),Естественные науки,Псевдонаука,Религия,Религия (мотив),Эволюция 
STI 0 0 |a Εξέλιξη,Θρησκεία,Θρησκεία (μοτίβο),Φυσικές επιστήμες (μοτίβο),Φυσικές επιστήμες,Ψευδοεπιστήμη 
SUB |a REL 
SYE 0 0 |a Abstammung , Religion,Mystik,Mythologie 
SYG 0 0 |a Cognitive science of religion , Naturforschung,Naturlehre,Naturwissenschaft,Naturforschung,Naturlehre,Naturwissenschaft , Abstammung