Der ontologische Gottesbeweis
The essay discusses three versions of the ontological proof, i.e. first the version advocated by Anselm and Descartes, second the version that assumes the notion of God as an absolute ens necessarium, and a third version developed by the author following Leibniz’ theory of the striving possibles. In...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic/Print Article |
| Language: | German |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
De Gruyter
2002
|
| In: |
Neue Zeitschrift für systematische Theologie und Religionsphilosophie
Year: 2000, Volume: 44, Pages: 245-267 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a2200000 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1621701182 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20220606121608.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 080121s2002 xx ||||| 00| ||ger c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.15496/publikation-55557 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1621701182 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-576)276394313 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ276394313 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a ger | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)120431475 |0 (DE-627)080670210 |0 (DE-576)171170318 |4 aut |a Hermanni, Friedrich |d 1958- | |
| 109 | |a Hermanni, Friedrich 1958- | ||
| 245 | 1 | 4 | |a Der ontologische Gottesbeweis |c Friedrich Hermanni |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2002 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a The essay discusses three versions of the ontological proof, i.e. first the version advocated by Anselm and Descartes, second the version that assumes the notion of God as an absolute ens necessarium, and a third version developed by the author following Leibniz’ theory of the striving possibles. In addition, the three most important objections against the ontological proof are discussed, namely the so-called logical objection, the objection disputing the conceivableness of God, and finally the objection raised by Kant. Evidence is being given that the logical objection is definitely wrong and that through the two other objections the first and the second version are vitiated, whereas the third is not disproved. The thesis is that the third version presents, in fact, a valid proof of God’s existence. | ||
| 601 | |a Ontologie | ||
| 601 | |a Gottesbeweis | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Neue Zeitschrift für systematische Theologie und Religionsphilosophie |d Berlin : De Gruyter, 1959 |g 44(2000), Seite 245-267 |w (DE-627)129474436 |w (DE-600)203055-X |w (DE-576)014852306 |x 0028-3517 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:44 |g year:2000 |g pages:245-267 |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |u http://hdl.handle.net/10900/114182 |x Resolving-System |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.15496/publikation-55557 |x Resolving-System |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 |b 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 3241803600 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1621701182 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20080121083454 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 080121||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-21-31 |c DE-627 |d DE-21-31 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-21-31 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |c Ze 161-44 |m p |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a kneu | ||
| LOK | |0 938 |k p | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 342253427X | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1621701182 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20190416102716 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 190416||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzw | ||
| OAS | |a 1 | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||