Recognising the archpriest: seeking clarification or fomenting schism?
Rome's decision to name an archpriest and to erect a highly irregular administrative structure, the archpresbyterate, surprised secular clergy and Jesuits who had advocated the establishment of bishops. Recent tension between Jesuits and secular clergy highlighted the need and importance of an...
主要作者: | |
---|---|
格式: | 電子 Article |
語言: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
出版: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
[2015]
|
In: |
British Catholic history
Year: 2015, 卷: 32, 發布: 4, Pages: 473-491 |
IxTheo Classification: | KAG Church history 1500-1648; Reformation; humanism; Renaissance KBF British Isles KDB Roman Catholic Church RB Church office; congregation |
Further subjects: | B
William Clarke
B John Colleton B Edward Oldcorne B Elizabethan Jesuits B Appellants B Archpriest Controversy B Henry Garnet |
在線閱讀: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
總結: | Rome's decision to name an archpriest and to erect a highly irregular administrative structure, the archpresbyterate, surprised secular clergy and Jesuits who had advocated the establishment of bishops. Recent tension between Jesuits and secular clergy highlighted the need and importance of an hierarchical, ecclesiological office. But the appointment was made in such a way that some secular clergy questioned its legitimacy and authenticity. Until they ascertained that the decision had in fact been made by the pope, they withheld recognition of the archpriest. As they awaited a reply to their appeal, two Appellants, John Colleton and William Clarke, debated the matter with two Jesuit supporters of the archpriest, Henry Garnet and Edward Oldcorne who apparently failed to see the canonical issue involved, as they perceived anti-Jesuitism as the motivating factor. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2055-7981 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: British Catholic history
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1017/bch.2015.17 |