Claiming Responsibility for Action Under Duress
This paper argues that to understand the varieties of wrongs done in coercion, we should examine the dynamic normative relation that the coercer establishes with the coerced. The case rests on a critical examination of coercion by threat, which is proved irreducible to psychological inducement by ov...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Springer Science + Business Media B. V
[2018]
|
| In: |
Ethical theory and moral practice
Year: 2018, Volume: 21, Issue: 4, Pages: 851-868 |
| IxTheo Classification: | NCB Personal ethics VA Philosophy |
| Further subjects: | B
Onora O'Neill
B Deliberation B Volitional necessity B Choice B Autonomy B Robert Nozick B Christine Korsgaard B Hard choices B Responsibility B Coercion B Harry Frankfurt |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) |