Philippa Foot's So-called Achilles' Heel: On the Distinctiveness of Her Grammatical Naturalism

Philippa Foot's attempt in Natural Goodness to defend the claim that moral goodness is a form of species-specific natural goodness and that immorality is a natural defect has elicited a number of challenges. For instance, Scott Woodcock presents the following dilemma: Foot's account of nat...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Published in:American catholic philosophical quarterly
Main Author: Jordan, Jessy (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Philosophy Documentation Center [2017]
In: American catholic philosophical quarterly
Further subjects:B Foot, Philippa
B Naturalism
B NATURAL Goodness (Book)
B Normativity (Ethics)
B Immorality
Online Access: Volltext (doi)
Description
Summary:Philippa Foot's attempt in Natural Goodness to defend the claim that moral goodness is a form of species-specific natural goodness and that immorality is a natural defect has elicited a number of challenges. For instance, Scott Woodcock presents the following dilemma: Foot's account of natural normativity either yields morally objectionable results, or there exists an appeal to a normative standard not grounded in natural norms. I contend that the Footian Neo-Aristotelian approach possesses the resources necessary for an adequate answer to this dilemma. I argue that Foot's naturalism does wind up with a normative standard not grounded in empirically typical natural norms but that it is no Achilles' heel. To support this thesis, I contend that such a standard appears inappropriate only if one assumes Foot is endeavoring to justify or establish a substantive conception of human goodness and defect, something she is not attempting.
ISSN:2153-8441
Contains:Enthalten in: American catholic philosophical quarterly
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.5840/acpq201737113