Aquinas, Stump, and the Nature of a Simple God
In order for God to be simple, He must be esse itself, but in some texts Aquinas seems to distinguish between esse and id quod est, so it seems that God cannot be an id quod est. To resolve this tension, Eleonore Stump proposes quantum theology, whereby we are able to attribute contradictory predica...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Philosophy Documentation Center
[2016]
|
| In: |
American catholic philosophical quarterly
Year: 2016, Volume: 90, Issue: 3, Pages: 441-454 |
| Further subjects: | B
Theology
B God |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (doi) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1588247538 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20190301101515.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 190301s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.5840/acpq201661494 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1588247538 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-576)518247538 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ518247538 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1046757105 |0 (DE-627)777035499 |0 (DE-576)400091321 |4 aut |a Kerr, Gavin | |
| 109 | |a Kerr, Gavin | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Aquinas, Stump, and the Nature of a Simple God |c Gaven Kerr |
| 264 | 1 | |c [2016] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a In order for God to be simple, He must be esse itself, but in some texts Aquinas seems to distinguish between esse and id quod est, so it seems that God cannot be an id quod est. To resolve this tension, Eleonore Stump proposes quantum theology, whereby we are able to attribute contradictory predicates to a thing of which we have no quidditative knowledge; so God then can be seen as esse itself and as an ens. In this paper I criticise this approach and hold that there is a principled philosophical approach that we can take to these matters through a greater clariication of what it means for God to be pure esse. It is seen that this latter approach entails that God is indeed an ens, so that the ens-hood of God is derived from His being pure esse, in which case quantum theology is not needed for a homistic resolution of the problem. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a God | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Theology | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t American catholic philosophical quarterly |d Charlottesville, Va. : Philosophy Documentation Center, 1990 |g 90(2016), 3, Seite 441-454 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)372353592 |w (DE-600)2122401-8 |w (DE-576)47637314X |x 2153-8441 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:90 |g year:2016 |g number:3 |g pages:441-454 |
| 856 | |u https://doi.org/10.5840/acpq201661494 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 90 |j 2016 |e 3 |h 441-454 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 3057063462 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1588247538 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20190301100547 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 190301||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||