Risk and the Libertarian Case for Redistribution
In the present contribution I argue three things. First, political libertarians should think that it is wrong to create a risk of non-negligible harm for non-consenting others. Second, that in order to secure consent to being placed at risk, we will have to make compensatory payments to those we put...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Peeters
[2018]
|
| In: |
Ethical perspectives
Year: 2018, Volume: 25, Issue: 3, Pages: 497-516 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Risk
/ Compensation
/ Redistribution
/ Libertarianism
|
| IxTheo Classification: | NCC Social ethics NCD Political ethics VA Philosophy ZC Politics in general |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (doi) |