Risk and the Libertarian Case for Redistribution
In the present contribution I argue three things. First, political libertarians should think that it is wrong to create a risk of non-negligible harm for non-consenting others. Second, that in order to secure consent to being placed at risk, we will have to make compensatory payments to those we put...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Peeters
[2018]
|
| In: |
Ethical perspectives
Year: 2018, Volume: 25, Issue: 3, Pages: 497-516 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Risk
/ Compensation
/ Redistribution
/ Libertarianism
|
| IxTheo Classification: | NCC Social ethics NCD Political ethics VA Philosophy ZC Politics in general |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (doi) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a2200000 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1588117693 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20190227115542.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 190226s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.2143/EP.25.3.3285427 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1588117693 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-576)518117693 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ518117693 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Haines, Jeffrey |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 109 | |a Haines, Jeffrey | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Risk and the Libertarian Case for Redistribution |c Jeffrey Haines (Florida State University, US) |
| 264 | 1 | |c [2018] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a In the present contribution I argue three things. First, political libertarians should think that it is wrong to create a risk of non-negligible harm for non-consenting others. Second, that in order to secure consent to being placed at risk, we will have to make compensatory payments to those we put at risk. Third, since such a system of payments would be highly impractical, and would require an enormously intrusive bureaucracy to enforce, libertarians should instead prefer a generalized system of redistribution. Such a system would base receipt of payments not on need, but on exposure to risk, and would require greater payments not from the wealthier, per se, but from those who create more risk for other people. In general, however, to the extent that wealthier people create more risk for the poor than vice versa (e.g. the driver of the car creates a bigger risk for the pedestrian than the pedestrian does for the driver of the car), such redistributive payments will match up with more standard notions of welfare. If this is right, then considerations of risk imply that libertarians should support a fairly robust redistributive state. | ||
| 652 | |a NCC:NCD:VA:ZC | ||
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4050129-2 |0 (DE-627)104744294 |0 (DE-576)209085665 |2 gnd |a Risiko |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4014900-6 |0 (DE-627)106338331 |0 (DE-576)208909850 |2 gnd |a Entschädigung |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4121808-5 |0 (DE-627)105766917 |0 (DE-576)209546336 |2 gnd |a Umverteilung |
| 689 | 0 | 3 | |d s |0 (DE-588)7588724-1 |0 (DE-627)548618534 |0 (DE-576)273827324 |2 gnd |a Libertarianismus |
| 689 | 0 | |5 (DE-627) | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Ethical perspectives |d Leuven : Peeters, 1994 |g 25(2018), 3, Seite 497-516 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)389126381 |w (DE-600)2148229-9 |w (DE-576)112891179 |x 1783-1431 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:25 |g year:2018 |g number:3 |g pages:497-516 |
| 856 | |u https://doi.org/10.2143/EP.25.3.3285427 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 25 |j 2018 |e 3 |h 497-516 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 3056742285 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1588117693 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20190227115542 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 190226||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442053844 |a VA | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1550736965 |a ZC | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 144205283X |a NCC | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442052856 |a NCD | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| STA | 0 | 0 | |a Compensation,Libertarianism,Redistribution,Risk |
| STB | 0 | 0 | |a Dédommagement,Libertarianisme,Redistribution,Risque |
| STC | 0 | 0 | |a Análisis,Indemnización,Libertarianismo,Redistribución |
| STD | 0 | 0 | |a Libertarianismo,Ridistribuzione,Risarcimento,Rischio |
| STE | 0 | 0 | |a 赔款,补偿费,风险 |
| STF | 0 | 0 | |a 自由意志主義,賠款,補償費,風險 |
| STG | 0 | 0 | |a Análise,Indenização,Libertarianismo,Redistribuição |
| STH | 0 | 0 | |a Компенсация,Либертарианизм,Перераспределение,Риск |
| STI | 0 | 0 | |a Ανακατανομή,Αποζημίωση,Ελευθεριασμός,Κίνδυνος |
| SUB | |a REL | ||
| SYG | 0 | 0 | |a Wirtschaftliche Entwicklung - Technischer Fortschritt - Risiko,Gefährdung,Bedrohung , Entschädigungsrecht,Entschädigungsleistung , Redistribution , Libertarismus,Libertäre |