The Catholic Bishops vs. the Contraceptive Mandate
The Roman Catholic bishops of the United States have publicly opposed artificial contraception since they first issued a public statement condemning it in 1919. Thereafter, the bishops were generally unsuccessful in persuading the public that contraceptive access should be restricted. Recently, howe...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
MDPI
[2015]
|
In: |
Religions
Year: 2015, Volume: 6, Issue: 4, Pages: 1411-1432 |
Further subjects: | B
Contraceptive Mandate
B Religious Freedom Restoration Act B First Amendment B Contraception B Bishops B Affordable Care Act |
Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1586061852 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20190109121732.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 190109s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.3390/rel6041411 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1586061852 | ||
035 | |a (DE-576)516061852 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ516061852 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Griffin, Leslie C. |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 4 | |a The Catholic Bishops vs. the Contraceptive Mandate |c Leslie C. Griffin |
264 | 1 | |c [2015] | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a The Roman Catholic bishops of the United States have publicly opposed artificial contraception since they first issued a public statement condemning it in 1919. Thereafter, the bishops were generally unsuccessful in persuading the public that contraceptive access should be restricted. Recently, however, the bishops succeeded in a campaign to restrict access to contraceptives for Catholic and non-Catholic women alike. Their lobbying and public criticism of the contraceptive mandate of the Affordable Care Act (ACA), which requires employer health plans to offer preventive reproductive care coverage, forced Obama administration officials into a series of accommodations that gutted portions of the law intended to provide contraception to employees without copayment or cost sharing. In contrast to their earlier efforts to restrict reproductive freedom, the bishops successfully characterized their efforts against the ACA as a battle for religious freedom rather than against reproductive rights. This successful strategy may lead to future setbacks for women's reproductive liberty. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Affordable Care Act | |
650 | 4 | |a Religious Freedom Restoration Act | |
650 | 4 | |a Bishops | |
650 | 4 | |a Contraception | |
650 | 4 | |a Contraceptive Mandate | |
650 | 4 | |a First Amendment | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Religions |d Basel : MDPI, 2010 |g 6(2015), 4, Seite 1411-1432 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)665435797 |w (DE-600)2620962-7 |w (DE-576)348219067 |x 2077-1444 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:6 |g year:2015 |g number:4 |g pages:1411-1432 |
856 | |u https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/6/4/1411/pdf?version=1450425360 |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h publisher [oa journal (via doaj)] | ||
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/6/4/1411 |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
856 | |u https://doi.org/10.3390/rel6041411 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
936 | u | w | |d 6 |j 2015 |e 4 |h 1411-1432 |
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 3039338897 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1586061852 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20190109121732 | ||
LOK | |0 008 190109||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
OAS | |a 1 | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
REL | |a 1 | ||
SUB | |a REL |