One step up and two steps back? The Italian debate on secularization, heteronormativity and LGBTQ citizenship
The aim of this article is to furnish insights of the Italian public debate on the recognition of LGBTQ rights, which can be understood as an interesting case study of the complex relationship between (multi)secularisation processes and re/definition of citizenship models. More specifically, the art...
| Главные авторы: | ; ; |
|---|---|
| Формат: | Электронный ресурс Статья |
| Язык: | Английский |
| Проверить наличие: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Опубликовано: |
[2018]
|
| В: |
Social compass
Год: 2018, Том: 65, Выпуск: 5, Страницы: 591-607 |
| Нормированные ключевые слова (последовательности): | B
Италия (мотив)
/ Общественность
/ LGBT
/ Признание
/ Дебаты
|
| Индексация IxTheo: | AD Социология религии CB Христианская жизнь KBJ Италия |
| Другие ключевые слова: | B
égalité de genre
B Gender Equality B mouvement catholique néo-fondamentaliste B analyse critique du discours B Laïcité B neo-conservative Catholic movements B sexual and intimate citizenship B Critical Discourse Analysis B LGBTQ movements B citoyenneté sexuelle et intime B Secularisation B mouvement LGBTQ |
| Online-ссылка: |
Volltext (Publisher) |
| Итог: | The aim of this article is to furnish insights of the Italian public debate on the recognition of LGBTQ rights, which can be understood as an interesting case study of the complex relationship between (multi)secularisation processes and re/definition of citizenship models. More specifically, the article analyses two political events related to this debate that took place in Rome in June 2015. The first is the Family Day demonstration, promoted by conservative Catholic groups; the second is the LGBTQ Pride parade, promoted by various gay, lesbian and transsexual/gender associations. We analyse the official statements issued by the two organising committees of the demonstrations, adopting the framework and methods of the Critical Discourse Analysis. Above and beyond an evident political conflict between the two discourses, we try to shed light on their mutual construction on the basis of what we call naturalization' and universalization' processes. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1461-7404 |
| Второстепенные работы: | Enthalten in: Social compass
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/0037768618800750 |
