Orienting Reason: A Religious Critique of Philosophizing Nāgārjuna
Recent scholarly interest in Nāgārjuna has been intense, with especial focus on the vexed question of the rationality, or irrationality, of his thought. In this article, I am concerned to bring to light the theoretical underpinnings of the hermeneutical project predominant among present-day scholars...
| Κύριος συγγραφέας: | |
|---|---|
| Τύπος μέσου: | Ηλεκτρονική πηγή Άρθρο |
| Γλώσσα: | Αγγλικά |
| Έλεγχος διαθεσιμότητας: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Φόρτωση...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Έκδοση: |
Oxford University Press
[2018]
|
| Στο/Στη: |
Journal of the American Academy of Religion
Έτος: 2018, Τόμος: 86, Τεύχος: 4, Σελίδες: 1072-1106 |
| Τυποποιημένες (ακολουθίες) λέξεων-κλειδιών: | B
Nāgārjuna ca. 2. Jh.
/ Βουδιστική φιλοσοφία
/ Αποδοχή (μοτίβο)
|
| Σημειογραφίες IxTheo: | AB Φιλοσοφία της θρησκείας, Κριτική της θρησκείας, Αθεϊσμός BL Βουδισμός VB Λογική, Φιλοσοφική Ερμηνευτική, Φιλοσοφικό δόγμα της γνώσης |
| Διαθέσιμο Online: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
| Σύνοψη: | Recent scholarly interest in Nāgārjuna has been intense, with especial focus on the vexed question of the rationality, or irrationality, of his thought. In this article, I am concerned to bring to light the theoretical underpinnings of the hermeneutical project predominant among present-day scholars, which is to actively overlook or downright depreciate the religious motivation of Nāgārjuna's arguments. While this project has typically been pursued in an apologetic effort to justify Nāgārjuna, as truly worthy of the title philosopher, to mainstream philosophers, it has also had the effect among some scholars of dismissing him as insufficiently philosophical. Regardless of the glowing or dim light in which he is thereby cast, Nāgārjuna is appraised according to exclusively philosophical criteria. My religious critique of philosophizing Nāgārjuna, then, is aimed at elucidating and problematizing this approach as at best tangential to and at worst seriously distortive of Nāgārjuna's thought as a whole. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1477-4585 |
| Περιλαμβάνει: | Enthalten in: American Academy of Religion, Journal of the American Academy of Religion
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1093/jaarel/lfy021 |