Orienting Reason: A Religious Critique of Philosophizing Nāgārjuna
Recent scholarly interest in Nāgārjuna has been intense, with especial focus on the vexed question of the rationality, or irrationality, of his thought. In this article, I am concerned to bring to light the theoretical underpinnings of the hermeneutical project predominant among present-day scholars...
1. VerfasserIn: | |
---|---|
Medienart: | Elektronisch Aufsatz |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Veröffentlicht: |
Oxford University Press
[2018]
|
In: |
Journal of the American Academy of Religion
Jahr: 2018, Band: 86, Heft: 4, Seiten: 1072-1106 |
normierte Schlagwort(-folgen): | B
Nāgārjuna ca. 2. Jh.
/ Buddhistische Philosophie
/ Rezeption
|
IxTheo Notationen: | AB Religionsphilosophie; Religionskritik; Atheismus BL Buddhismus VB Logik; philosophische Hermeneutik; philosophische Erkenntnislehre |
Online Zugang: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 158511426X | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20200310092821.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 181212s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1093/jaarel/lfy021 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)158511426X | ||
035 | |a (DE-576)51511426X | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ51511426X | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1173269967 |0 (DE-627)104242215X |0 (DE-576)515116742 |4 aut |a Stepien, Rafal K. | |
109 | |a Stepien, Rafal K. | ||
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Orienting Reason |b A Religious Critique of Philosophizing Nāgārjuna |c Rafal K. Stepien |
264 | 1 | |c [2018] | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Recent scholarly interest in Nāgārjuna has been intense, with especial focus on the vexed question of the rationality, or irrationality, of his thought. In this article, I am concerned to bring to light the theoretical underpinnings of the hermeneutical project predominant among present-day scholars, which is to actively overlook or downright depreciate the religious motivation of Nāgārjuna's arguments. While this project has typically been pursued in an apologetic effort to justify Nāgārjuna, as truly worthy of the title philosopher, to mainstream philosophers, it has also had the effect among some scholars of dismissing him as insufficiently philosophical. Regardless of the glowing or dim light in which he is thereby cast, Nāgārjuna is appraised according to exclusively philosophical criteria. My religious critique of philosophizing Nāgārjuna, then, is aimed at elucidating and problematizing this approach as at best tangential to and at worst seriously distortive of Nāgārjuna's thought as a whole. | ||
601 | |a Philosophie | ||
652 | |a AB:BL:VB | ||
689 | 0 | 0 | |d p |0 (DE-588)118641263 |0 (DE-627)079427812 |0 (DE-576)209196858 |2 gnd |a Nāgārjuna |d ca. 2. Jh. |
689 | 0 | 1 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4332682-1 |0 (DE-627)148052088 |0 (DE-576)211333654 |2 gnd |a Buddhistische Philosophie |
689 | 0 | 2 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4049716-1 |0 (DE-627)104675152 |0 (DE-576)209083182 |2 gnd |a Rezeption |
689 | 0 | |5 (DE-627) | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |a American Academy of Religion |t Journal of the American Academy of Religion |d Oxford : Oxford University Press, 1967 |g 86(2018), 4, Seite 1072-1106 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)338767819 |w (DE-600)2064642-2 |w (DE-576)10686971X |x 1477-4585 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:86 |g year:2018 |g number:4 |g pages:1072-1106 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://academic.oup.com/jaar/article/86/4/1072/5032615 |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
856 | |u https://doi.org/10.1093/jaarel/lfy021 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
936 | u | w | |d 86 |j 2018 |e 4 |h 1072-1106 |
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 3037768347 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 158511426X | ||
LOK | |0 005 20191122135055 | ||
LOK | |0 008 181212||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442043644 |a BL | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442042990 |a AB | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 144205381X |a VB | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
REL | |a 1 | ||
STA | 0 | 0 | |a Buddhist philosophy,Buddhism,Philosophy,Reception,Reception,Impact,Afterlife |
STB | 0 | 0 | |a Philosophie bouddhiste,Réception <scientifique>,Réception <scientifique>,Influence intellectuelle,Influence intellectuelle,Influence intellectuelle (motif),Influence intellectuelle |
STC | 0 | 0 | |a Filosofía budista,Recepción,Recepción |
STD | 0 | 0 | |a Filosofia buddhista,Filosofia buddista,Filosofia buddista,Ricezione,Ricezione |
STE | 0 | 0 | |a 佛教哲学,接受,接收 |
STF | 0 | 0 | |a 佛教哲學,接受,接收 |
STG | 0 | 0 | |a Filosofia budista,Recepção,Recepção |
STH | 0 | 0 | |a Буддисткая философия,Восприятие (мотив),Восприятие |
STI | 0 | 0 | |a Αποδοχή (μοτίβο),Αποδοχή,Βουδιστική φιλοσοφία |
SUB | |a REL | ||
SYG | 0 | 0 | |a Klu-sgrub,ca. 2. Jh.,Vphags-pa-klu-sgrub,ca. 2. Jh.,Nagardschuna,ca. 2. Jh.,Klu-sgrub,'Phags-pa,ca. 2. Jh.,Nagardzhuna,ca. 2. Jh.,Ryuju,ca. 2. Jh.,Nagarjuna,ca. 2. Jh.,Lu-chu,ca. 2. Jh.,Luzhu,ca. 2. Jh.,Lung-meng,ca. 2. Jh.,Lung-shu,ca. 2. Jh.,Lung-sheng,ca. 2. Jh.,Lung-hu,ca. 2. Jh.,Lu-trub,ca. 2. Jh.,Yong-su,ca. 2. Jh.,Nakhanchun,ca. 2. Jh.,Nakharachun,ca. 2. Jh.,Nakhanrachun,ca. 2. Jh.,'Phags-pa Klu-sgrub,ca. 2. Jh.,Ācārya Nāgārjuna,ca. 2. Jh.,Slob-dpon Klu-sgrub,ca. 2. Jh.,Nāgārjuna, Ārya,ca. 2. Jh.,Klu-sgrub,Slob dpon,ca. 2. Jh.,Nagarjuna,Saint,ca. 2. Jh.,Nagarjuna,ca. 2. Jh. , Buddhismus , Fortwirken,Nachwirkung,Nachleben,Wirkungsgeschichte,Aneignung |