Orienting Reason: A Religious Critique of Philosophizing Nāgārjuna

Recent scholarly interest in Nāgārjuna has been intense, with especial focus on the vexed question of the rationality, or irrationality, of his thought. In this article, I am concerned to bring to light the theoretical underpinnings of the hermeneutical project predominant among present-day scholars...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:  
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. VerfasserIn: Stepien, Rafal K. (VerfasserIn)
Medienart: Elektronisch Aufsatz
Sprache:Englisch
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Lade...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Veröffentlicht: Oxford University Press [2018]
In: Journal of the American Academy of Religion
Jahr: 2018, Band: 86, Heft: 4, Seiten: 1072-1106
normierte Schlagwort(-folgen):B Nāgārjuna ca. 2. Jh. / Buddhistische Philosophie / Rezeption
IxTheo Notationen:AB Religionsphilosophie; Religionskritik; Atheismus
BL Buddhismus
VB Logik; philosophische Hermeneutik; philosophische Erkenntnislehre
Online Zugang: Volltext (Verlag)
Volltext (doi)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 158511426X
003 DE-627
005 20200310092821.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 181212s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1093/jaarel/lfy021  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)158511426X 
035 |a (DE-576)51511426X 
035 |a (DE-599)BSZ51511426X 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1173269967  |0 (DE-627)104242215X  |0 (DE-576)515116742  |4 aut  |a Stepien, Rafal K. 
109 |a Stepien, Rafal K. 
245 1 0 |a Orienting Reason  |b  A Religious Critique of Philosophizing Nāgārjuna  |c Rafal K. Stepien 
264 1 |c [2018] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Recent scholarly interest in Nāgārjuna has been intense, with especial focus on the vexed question of the rationality, or irrationality, of his thought. In this article, I am concerned to bring to light the theoretical underpinnings of the hermeneutical project predominant among present-day scholars, which is to actively overlook or downright depreciate the religious motivation of Nāgārjuna's arguments. While this project has typically been pursued in an apologetic effort to justify Nāgārjuna, as truly worthy of the title “philosopher,” to mainstream philosophers, it has also had the effect among some scholars of dismissing him as insufficiently philosophical. Regardless of the glowing or dim light in which he is thereby cast, Nāgārjuna is appraised according to exclusively philosophical criteria. My “religious critique of philosophizing Nāgārjuna,” then, is aimed at elucidating and problematizing this approach as at best tangential to and at worst seriously distortive of Nāgārjuna's thought as a whole. 
601 |a Philosophie 
652 |a AB:BL:VB 
689 0 0 |d p  |0 (DE-588)118641263  |0 (DE-627)079427812  |0 (DE-576)209196858  |2 gnd  |a Nāgārjuna  |d ca. 2. Jh. 
689 0 1 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4332682-1  |0 (DE-627)148052088  |0 (DE-576)211333654  |2 gnd  |a Buddhistische Philosophie 
689 0 2 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4049716-1  |0 (DE-627)104675152  |0 (DE-576)209083182  |2 gnd  |a Rezeption 
689 0 |5 (DE-627) 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |a American Academy of Religion  |t Journal of the American Academy of Religion  |d Oxford : Oxford University Press, 1967  |g 86(2018), 4, Seite 1072-1106  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)338767819  |w (DE-600)2064642-2  |w (DE-576)10686971X  |x 1477-4585  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:86  |g year:2018  |g number:4  |g pages:1072-1106 
856 4 0 |u https://academic.oup.com/jaar/article/86/4/1072/5032615  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 
856 |u https://doi.org/10.1093/jaarel/lfy021  |x doi  |3 Volltext 
936 u w |d 86  |j 2018  |e 4  |h 1072-1106 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3037768347 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 158511426X 
LOK |0 005 20191122135055 
LOK |0 008 181212||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442043644  |a BL 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442042990  |a AB 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 144205381X  |a VB 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
STA 0 0 |a Buddhist philosophy,Buddhism,Philosophy,Reception,Reception,Impact,Afterlife 
STB 0 0 |a Philosophie bouddhiste,Réception <scientifique>,Réception <scientifique>,Influence intellectuelle,Influence intellectuelle,Influence intellectuelle (motif),Influence intellectuelle 
STC 0 0 |a Filosofía budista,Recepción,Recepción 
STD 0 0 |a Filosofia buddhista,Filosofia buddista,Filosofia buddista,Ricezione,Ricezione 
STE 0 0 |a 佛教哲学,接受,接收 
STF 0 0 |a 佛教哲學,接受,接收 
STG 0 0 |a Filosofia budista,Recepção,Recepção 
STH 0 0 |a Буддисткая философия,Восприятие (мотив),Восприятие 
STI 0 0 |a Αποδοχή (μοτίβο),Αποδοχή,Βουδιστική φιλοσοφία 
SUB |a REL 
SYG 0 0 |a Klu-sgrub,ca. 2. Jh.,Vphags-pa-klu-sgrub,ca. 2. Jh.,Nagardschuna,ca. 2. Jh.,Klu-sgrub,'Phags-pa,ca. 2. Jh.,Nagardzhuna,ca. 2. Jh.,Ryuju,ca. 2. Jh.,Nagarjuna,ca. 2. Jh.,Lu-chu,ca. 2. Jh.,Luzhu,ca. 2. Jh.,Lung-meng,ca. 2. Jh.,Lung-shu,ca. 2. Jh.,Lung-sheng,ca. 2. Jh.,Lung-hu,ca. 2. Jh.,Lu-trub,ca. 2. Jh.,Yong-su,ca. 2. Jh.,Nakhanchun,ca. 2. Jh.,Nakharachun,ca. 2. Jh.,Nakhanrachun,ca. 2. Jh.,'Phags-pa Klu-sgrub,ca. 2. Jh.,Ācārya Nāgārjuna,ca. 2. Jh.,Slob-dpon Klu-sgrub,ca. 2. Jh.,Nāgārjuna, Ārya,ca. 2. Jh.,Klu-sgrub,Slob dpon,ca. 2. Jh.,Nagarjuna,Saint,ca. 2. Jh.,Nagarjuna,ca. 2. Jh. , Buddhismus , Fortwirken,Nachwirkung,Nachleben,Wirkungsgeschichte,Aneignung