Indian Philosophy and Ethics: Dialogical Method as a Fresh Possibility
This paper discusses the positions held by two opposing campsthe traditionalists and the positivists (to use Pradeep Gokhale's typology) regarding the presence or absence of ethics in Indian philosophy. It subsequently offers a way ahead of the impasse where I consider some inputs inherent in...
| Опубликовано в: : | Sophia |
|---|---|
| Главный автор: | |
| Формат: | Электронный ресурс Статья |
| Язык: | Английский |
| Проверить наличие: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Загрузка...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Опубликовано: |
Springer Netherlands
[2018]
|
| В: |
Sophia
|
| Индексация IxTheo: | BK Индуизм KBM Азия NCA Этика TK Новейшее время VA Философия |
| Другие ключевые слова: | B
Ethics
B Other' B Dialogue B Indian ethics B Inter-religious B Pūrvapakṣa B Debate B Self B No-ethics |
| Online-ссылка: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
| Итог: | This paper discusses the positions held by two opposing campsthe traditionalists and the positivists (to use Pradeep Gokhale's typology) regarding the presence or absence of ethics in Indian philosophy. It subsequently offers a way ahead of the impasse where I consider some inputs inherent in the method of dialogue in pre-modern Indian philosophy for imagining an ethics of and ethics for plurality. Such an ethics, I argue, cannot be imagined without involving the category of Other,' which has otherwise remained elusive in the Indian philosophical debates. The diverse nature of Indian societies demands Other-centric ethics to assess and evaluate the enduring moral crisis pervading contemporary times. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1873-930X |
| Второстепенные работы: | Enthalten in: Sophia
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1007/s11841-018-0673-6 |